DBMS > EJDB vs. EventStoreDB vs. Manticore Search vs. SAP Advantage Database Server

System Properties Comparison EJDB vs. EventStoreDB vs. Manticore Search vs. SAP Advantage Database Server

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	EJDB  Xexclude from comparison	EventStoreDB  Xexclude from comparison	Manticore Search  Xexclude from comparison	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS  Xexclude from comparison
				SAP Advantage Database Server seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.
Description	Embeddable document-store database library with JSON representation of queries (in MongoDB style)	Industrial-strength, open-source database solution built from the ground up for event sourcing.	Multi-storage database for search, including full-text search.	Low-cost RDBMS with access to ISAM and FoxPro data structures
Primary database model	Document store	Event Store	Search engine	Relational DBMS
Secondary database models			Time Series DBMS using the Manticore Columnar Library
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart	Score 0.31 Rank #296   Overall #44   Document stores	Score 1.19 Rank #173   Overall #1   Event Stores	Score 0.29 Rank #302   Overall #21   Search engines
Website	github.com/­Softmotions/­ejdb	www.eventstore.com	manticoresearch.com	www.sap.com/products/advantage-database-server.html
Technical documentation	github.com/­Softmotions/­ejdb/­blob/­master/­README.md	developers.eventstore.com	manual.manticoresearch.com
Developer	Softmotions	Event Store Limited	Manticore Software	Sybase, SAP
Initial release	2012	2012	2017	1993
Current release		21.2, February 2021	6.0, February 2023
License Commercial or Open Source	Open Source GPLv2	Open Source	Open Source GPL version 2	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	C		C++
Server operating systems	server-less	Linux Windows	FreeBSD Linux macOS Windows	Linux Windows
Data scheme	schema-free		Fixed schema	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	yes string, integer, double, bool, date, object_id		Int, Bigint, Float, Timestamp, Bit, Int array, Bigint array, JSON, Boolean	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.			Can index from XML	no
Secondary indexes	no		yes full-text index on all search fields	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no		SQL-like query language	yes
APIs and other access methods	in-process shared library		Binary API RESTful HTTP/JSON API RESTful HTTP/SQL API SQL over MySQL	.NET Client API ADO.NET JDBC ODBC OLE DB
Supported programming languages	Actionscript C C# C++ Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) Lua Objective-C Pike Python Ruby		Elixir Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python	Delphi Perl PHP
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no		user defined functions	yes
Triggers	no		no	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	none		Sharding Partitioning is done manually, search queries against distributed index is supported	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	none		Synchronous replication based on Galera library	Multi-source replication CONFLICT Trigger to resolve replication conflicts Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods	no		no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system				Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no typically not needed, however similar functionality with collection joins possible		no	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	no		yes isolated transactions for atomic changes and binary logging for safe writes	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes Read/Write Locking		yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes		yes The original contents of fields are not stored in the Manticore index.	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.				no caching of (temporary) tables can be configured
User concepts Access control	no		no	fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	EJDB	EventStoreDB	Manticore Search	SAP Advantage Database Server former name: Sybase ADS
Recent citations in the news			Integrating Manticore Search with Apache Superset 8 August 2023, hackernoon.com Clickhouse vs Elasticsearch vs Manticore Search Query Times With a 1.7B NYC Taxi Rides Benchmark 1 June 2022, hackernoon.com Manticore is a Faster Alternative to Elasticsearch in C++ 25 July 2022, hackernoon.com 8 Google Alternatives: How to Search Crypto, the Dark Web, More 1 February 2023, Gizmodo Highlighting in Search Results 24 May 2020, hackernoon.com provided by Google News	SAP Announces Q3 2023 Results: Asia Pacific and Japan View 19 October 2023, SAP News provided by Google News

Share this page