DBMS > Coveo vs. HarperDB vs. OrigoDB vs. SpatiaLite

System Properties Comparison Coveo vs. HarperDB vs. OrigoDB vs. SpatiaLite

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

AI-powered hosted search, recommendation and personalization platform providing tools for both low-code and full-code development

HarperDB takes the "stack" out of "tech stack" by combining an ultra-fast document-style data store, in-memory cache, real-time message broker, and your application components into a single distributed technology.

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

Spatial extension of SQLite

Primary database model

Search engine

Document store

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

Spatial DBMS

Secondary database models

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	2.14
Rank	#116	Overall
	#11	Search engines

Score	0.55
Rank	#243	Overall
	#38	Document stores

Score	0.00
Rank	#385	Overall
	#54	Document stores
	#21	Object oriented DBMS

Score	1.56
Rank	#142	Overall
	#3	Spatial DBMS

Website

www.coveo.com

www.harperdb.io

origodb.com

www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libspatialite/index

Technical documentation

docs.coveo.com

docs.harperdb.io/docs

origodb.com/docs

www.gaia-gis.it/gaia-sins/spatialite_topics.html

Developer

Coveo

HarperDB

Robert Friberg et al

Alessandro Furieri

Initial release

2012

2017

2009

under the name LiveDB

2008

Current release

3.1, August 2021

5.0.0, August 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

free community edition available

Open Source

MPL 1.1, GPL v2.0 or LGPL v2.1

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Node.js

C++

Server operating systems

hosted

Linux
OS X

Linux
Windows

server-less

Data scheme

hybrid - fields need to be configured prior to indexing, but relationships can be exploited at query time without pre-configuration

dynamic schema

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

JSON data types

User defined using .NET types and collections

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

can be achieved using .NET

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like data manipulation statements

yes

APIs and other access methods

RESTful HTTP API

JDBC
ODBC
React Hooks
RESTful HTTP/JSON API
WebSocket

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

Supported programming languages

C#
Java
JavaScript
Python

.Net
C
C#
C++
ColdFusion
D
Dart
Delphi
Erlang
Go
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Lisp
MatLab
Objective C
Perl
PHP
PowerShell
Prolog
Python
R
Ruby
Rust
Scala
Swift

.Net

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Custom Functions

since release 3.1

yes

Triggers

yes

Domain Events

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

yes

A table resides as a whole on one (or more) nodes in a cluster

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

the nodes on which a table resides can be defined

Source-replica replication

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

depending on model

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

yes

Atomic execution of specific operations

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

yes, using LMDB

yes

Write ahead log

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

granular access controls, API key management, content filters

Access rights for users and roles

Role based authorization

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Spatial database management systems
6 April 2021, Matthias Gelbmann

show all

Recent citations in the news

Online grocery shopping to rise during 2024 holiday shopping season
17 September 2024, SmartBrief

Coveo Announces New Integration with Salesforce Data Cloud
11 September 2024, PR Newswire

Coveo Solutions Inc. (TSE:CVO) Receives Average Rating of "Buy" from Brokerages
18 September 2024, MarketBeat

Coveo Debuts GenAI Tools on Genesys Cloud and AppFoundry
17 May 2024, CX Today

Coveo Solutions Chairman & CEO Acquires 24% More Stock
13 September 2024, Simply Wall St

provided by Google News

HarperDB Attracts Significant Growth Investment from Serent Capital
12 June 2024, Business Wire

Defense Innovation Unit Issues Success Memo to HarperDB for its Common Operation Database Prototype
11 September 2024, PR Newswire

DoD Successfully Deploys Commercial AI Solutions for COD Project
10 September 2024, Defense Innovation Unit

Wilson Sonsini Advises Serent Capital on Significant Growth Investment in HarperDB
17 June 2024, Wilson Sonsini

HarperDB Receives Growth Investment from Serent Capital
12 June 2024, FinSMEs

provided by Google News

Share this page