DBMS > Bangdb vs. DataFS vs. Drizzle vs. Realm

System Properties Comparison Bangdb vs. DataFS vs. Drizzle vs. Realm

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Drizzle has published its last release in September 2012. The open-source project is discontinued and Drizzle is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Converged and high performance database for device data, events, time series, document and graph

All data is stored inside objects which are linked by so-called link attributes. Objects consist of classes which can be extended and de-extended at runtime. Graphs can be defined with a struct.

MySQL fork with a pluggable micro-kernel and with an emphasis of performance over compatibility.

A DBMS built for use on mobile devices that’s a fast, easy to use alternative to SQLite and Core Data

Primary database model

Document store
Graph DBMS
Time Series DBMS

Object oriented DBMS

Relational DBMS

Document store

Secondary database models

Spatial DBMS

Graph DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.08
Rank	#347	Overall
	#47	Document stores
	#34	Graph DBMS
	#31	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.06
Rank	#354	Overall
	#15	Object oriented DBMS

Score	7.60
Rank	#52	Overall
	#9	Document stores

Website

bangdb.com

newdatabase.com

realm.io

Technical documentation

docs.bangdb.com

dev.mobiland.com/Overview.xsp

realm.io/docs

Developer

Sachin Sinha, BangDB

Mobiland AG

Drizzle project, originally started by Brian Aker

Realm, acquired by MongoDB in May 2019

Initial release

2012

2018

2008

2014

Current release

BangDB 2.0, October 2021

1.1.263, October 2022

7.2.4, September 2012

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

BSD 3

commercial

Open Source

GNU GPL

Open Source

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C, C++

C++

Server operating systems

Linux

Windows

FreeBSD
Linux
OS X

Android
Backend: server-less
iOS
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

Classes, Structs, and Lists are written in proprietary DataTypeDefinitionLanguage (.dtdl) and Objects consisting of those are written in proprietary DataAccessDefinitionLanguage (.dadl)

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes: string, long, double, int, geospatial, stream, events

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

secondary, composite, nested, reverse, geospatial

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL like support with command line tool

yes

with proprietary extensions

APIs and other access methods

Proprietary protocol
RESTful HTTP API

.NET Client API
Proprietary client DLL
WinRT client

JDBC

Supported programming languages

C
C#
C++
Java
Python

.Net
C
C#
C++
VB.Net

C
C++
Java
PHP

.Net
Java

with Android only
Objective-C
React Native
Swift

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

runs within the applications so server-side scripts are unnecessary

Triggers

yes, Notifications (with Streaming only)

no, except callback-events from server when changes happened

hooks for callbacks inside the server can be used.

yes

Change Listeners

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding (enterprise version only). P2P based virtual network overlay with consistent hashing and chord algorithm

Proprietary Sharding system

Sharding

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

selectable replication factor, Knob for CAP (enterprise version only)

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Tunable consistency, set CAP knob accordingly

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes, optimistic concurrency control

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes, implements WAL (Write ahead log) as well

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes, run db with in-memory only mode

yes

In-Memory realm

User concepts

Access control

yes (enterprise version only)

Windows-Profile

Pluggable authentication mechanisms

e.g. LDAP, HTTP

yes

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

MySQL won the April ranking; did its forks follow?
1 April 2015, Paul Andlinger

Has MySQL finally lost its mojo?
1 July 2013, Matthias Gelbmann

show all

MySQL, PostgreSQL and Redis are the winners of the March ranking
2 March 2016, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

MongoDB aims to unify developer experience with launch of MongoDB Cloud
9 June 2020, diginomica

Is Swift the Future of Server-side Development?
12 September 2017, Solutions Review

Here are the winners of Nordic Startup Awards
31 May 2016, EU-Startups

Kotlin Programming Language Will Surpass Java On Android Next Year
15 October 2017, Fossbytes

Java Synthetic Methods — What are these? | by Vaibhav Singh
27 February 2021, DataDrivenInvestor

provided by Google News

Share this page