DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Machbase Neo vs. Percona Server for MongoDB vs. VelocityDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Machbase Neo vs. Percona Server for MongoDB vs. VelocityDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Machbase Neo Former name was Infiniflux  Xexclude from comparison	Percona Server for MongoDB  Xexclude from comparison	VelocityDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	TimeSeries DBMS for AIoT and BigData	A drop-in replacement for MongoDB Community Edition with enterprise-grade features.	A .NET Object Database that can be embedded/distributed and extended to a graph data model (VelocityGraph)
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Time Series DBMS	Document store	Graph DBMS Object oriented DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.17 Rank #337   Overall #30   Time Series DBMS	Score 0.60 Rank #246   Overall #39   Document stores	Score 0.11 Rank #354   Overall #37   Graph DBMS #15   Object oriented DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	machbase.com	www.percona.com/­mongodb/­software/­percona-server-for-mongodb	velocitydb.com
Technical documentation		machbase.com/­dbms	docs.percona.com/­percona-distribution-for-mongodb	velocitydb.com/­UserGuide
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Machbase	Percona	VelocityDB Inc
Initial release	2016	2013	2015	2011
Current release	1703	V8.0, August 2023	3.4.10-2.10, November 2017	7.x
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial free test version available	Open Source GPL Version 2	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	C	C++	C#
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux macOS Windows	Linux	Any that supports .NET
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	schema-free	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes	yes	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no	no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	SQL-like query language	no	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	gRPC HTTP REST JDBC MQTT (Message Queue Telemetry Transport) ODBC	proprietary protocol using JSON	.Net
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	C C# C++ Go Java JavaScript PHP via ODBC Python R via ODBC Scala	Actionscript C C# C++ Clojure ColdFusion D Dart Delphi Erlang Go Groovy Haskell Java JavaScript Lisp Lua MatLab Perl PHP PowerShell Prolog Python R Ruby Scala Smalltalk	.Net
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	JavaScript	no
Triggers	yes	no	no	Callbacks are triggered when data changes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding	Sharding	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	selectable replication factor	Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	yes	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration		Eventual Consistency Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	no	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	no	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes	yes volatile and lookup table	yes via In-Memory Engine	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	simple password-based access control	Access rights for users and roles	Based on Windows Authentication
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Machbase Neo Former name was Infiniflux	Percona Server for MongoDB	VelocityDB
Recent citations in the news			MongoDB Performance Tuning 23 May 2024, Database Trends and Applications Why Isn't the World Upgrading Its Databases? 25 March 2024, The New Stack FerretDB goes GA: Gives you MongoDB, without the MongoDB... 15 May 2023, The Stack The essential guide to MongoDB security 2 February 2017, InfoWorld Open-source developers under corporate pressure to adopt less-permissive licenses, Percona CEO says 13 May 2021, The Register provided by Google News

Share this page