DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. JSqlDb vs. Manticore Search vs. OrigoDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. JSqlDb vs. Manticore Search vs. OrigoDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	JSqlDb  Xexclude from comparison	Manticore Search  Xexclude from comparison	OrigoDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.	JSqlDB seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	JavaScript Query Language Database, stores JavaScript objects and primitives	Multi-storage database for search, including full-text search.	A fully ACID in-memory object graph database
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Document store Object oriented DBMS	Search engine	Document store Object oriented DBMS
Secondary database models			Time Series DBMS using the Manticore Columnar Library
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart			Score 0.29 Rank #302   Overall #21   Search engines	Score 0.06 Rank #380   Overall #50   Document stores #18   Object oriented DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	jsqldb.org (offline)	manticoresearch.com	origodb.com
Technical documentation			manual.manticoresearch.com	origodb.com/­docs
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Konrad von Backstrom	Manticore Software	Robert Friberg et al
Initial release	2016	2018	2017	2009 under the name LiveDB
Current release	1703	0.8, December 2018	6.0, February 2023
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source	Open Source GPL version 2	Open Source
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java		C++	C#
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux macOS Windows	FreeBSD Linux macOS Windows	Linux Windows
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	schema-free	Fixed schema	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	no	Int, Bigint, Float, Timestamp, Bit, Int array, Bigint array, JSON, Boolean	User defined using .NET types and collections
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	Can index from XML	no can be achieved using .NET
Secondary indexes	yes	no	yes full-text index on all search fields	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	SQL-like query language	no
APIs and other access methods	LDAP		Binary API RESTful HTTP/JSON API RESTful HTTP/SQL API SQL over MySQL	.NET Client API HTTP API LINQ
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	JavaScript	Elixir Go Java JavaScript (Node.js) Perl PHP Python	.Net
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	functions in JavaScript	user defined functions	yes
Triggers	yes	no	no	yes Domain Events
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	Sharding Partitioning is done manually, search queries against distributed index is supported	horizontal partitioning client side managed; servers are not synchronized
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	Synchronous replication based on Galera library	Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no	depending on model
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations		yes isolated transactions for atomic changes and binary logging for safe writes	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes		yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes using RocksDB	yes The original contents of fields are not stored in the Manticore index.	yes Write ahead log
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes			yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication		no	Role based authorization
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	JSqlDb	Manticore Search	OrigoDB
Recent citations in the news			Manticore Search Now Integrates With Grafana 9 August 2023, hackernoon.com Integrating Manticore Search with Apache Superset 8 August 2023, hackernoon.com Clickhouse vs Elasticsearch vs Manticore Search Query Times With a 1.7B NYC Taxi Rides Benchmark 1 June 2022, hackernoon.com 8 Google Alternatives: How to Search Crypto, the Dark Web, More 1 February 2023, Gizmodo Manticore is a Faster Alternative to Elasticsearch in C++ 25 July 2022, hackernoon.com provided by Google News

Share this page