DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BaseX vs. HarperDB vs. Transwarp StellarDB

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. BaseX vs. HarperDB vs. Transwarp StellarDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	BaseX  Xexclude from comparison	HarperDB  Xexclude from comparison	Transwarp StellarDB  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Light-weight Native XML DBMS with support for XQuery 3.0 and interactive GUI.	Ultra-low latency distributed database with an intuitive REST API supporting NoSQL and SQL (including joins). Deployment of functions and databases simultaneously with a consolidated node-level architecture.	A distributed graph DBMS built for enterprise-level graph applications
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Native XML DBMS	Document store	Graph DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 1.84 Rank #135   Overall #4   Native XML DBMS	Score 0.60 Rank #244   Overall #38   Document stores	Score 0.07 Rank #371   Overall #39   Graph DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	basex.org	www.harperdb.io	www.transwarp.cn/­en/­product/­stellardb
Technical documentation		docs.basex.org	docs.harperdb.io/­docs
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	BaseX GmbH	HarperDB	Transwarp
Initial release	2016	2007	2017
Current release	1703	11.0, June 2024	3.1, August 2021
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	Open Source BSD license	commercial free community edition available	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java	Node.js
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux OS X Windows	Linux OS X
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	schema-free	dynamic schema
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	no XQuery supports types	yes JSON data types
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes		no
Secondary indexes	yes	yes	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	SQL-like data manipulation statements	SQL-like query language
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	Java API RESTful HTTP API RESTXQ WebDAV XML:DB XQJ	JDBC ODBC React Hooks RESTful HTTP/JSON API WebSocket	OpenCypher
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	Actionscript C C# Haskell Java JavaScript Node.js Lisp Perl PHP Python Qt Rebol Ruby Scala Visual Basic	.Net C C# C++ ColdFusion D Dart Delphi Erlang Go Haskell Java JavaScript (Node.js) Lisp MatLab Objective C Perl PHP PowerShell Prolog Python R Ruby Rust Scala Swift
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	yes	Custom Functions since release 3.1
Triggers	yes	yes via events	no
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	none	A table resides as a whole on one (or more) nodes in a cluster	horizontal partitioning
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	none	yes the nodes on which a table resides can be defined
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration		Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	multiple readers, single writer	Atomic execution of specific operations
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes, using LMDB	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes		yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication	Users with fine-grained authorization concept on 4 levels	Access rights for users and roles	yes
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	BaseX	HarperDB	Transwarp StellarDB
Recent citations in the news		XML Injection Attacks: What to Know About XPath, XQuery, XXE & More 18 May 2022, Hashed Out by The SSL Store™ 9 Skills You Need to Become a Data Engineer 2 November 2022, KDnuggets Xml Databases Software Market Thriving at a Tremendous Growth – TIMC 16 June 2024, TIMC provided by Google News	Serent Capital invests in software firm HarperDB 12 June 2024, PE Hub HarperDB Attracts Significant Growth Investment from Serent Capital 12 June 2024, Business Wire HarperDB Receives Growth Investment from Serent Capital 12 June 2024, FinSMEs Startups of the Year 2023: Meet HarperDB - A Database and Application Development Platform 22 June 2023, hackernoon.com Jaxon Repp on HarperDB Distributed Database Platform 23 March 2022, InfoQ.com provided by Google News

Share this page