DBMS > Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Axibase vs. Prometheus vs. SpatiaLite

System Properties Comparison Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Axibase vs. Prometheus vs. SpatiaLite

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Axibase  Xexclude from comparison	Prometheus  Xexclude from comparison	SpatiaLite  Xexclude from comparison
	This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Scalable TimeSeries DBMS based on HBase with integrated rule engine and visualization	Open-source Time Series DBMS and monitoring system	Spatial extension of SQLite
Primary database model	Document store Key-value store	Time Series DBMS	Time Series DBMS	Spatial DBMS
Secondary database models				Relational DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart		Score 0.35 Rank #282   Overall #25   Time Series DBMS	Score 7.69 Rank #50   Overall #3   Time Series DBMS	Score 1.63 Rank #146   Overall #3   Spatial DBMS
Website	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	axibase.com/­docs/­atsd/­finance	prometheus.io	www.gaia-gis.it/­fossil/­libspatialite/­index
Technical documentation			prometheus.io/­docs	www.gaia-gis.it/­gaia-sins/­spatialite_topics.html
Developer	Atos Convergence Creators	Axibase Corporation		Alessandro Furieri
Initial release	2016	2013	2015	2008
Current release	1703	15585		5.0.0, August 2020
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial Community Edition (single node) is free, Enterprise Edition (distributed) is paid	Open Source Apache 2.0	Open Source MPL 1.1, GPL v2.0 or LGPL v2.1
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	no	no	no	no
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language	Java	Java	Go	C++
Server operating systems	Linux	Linux	Linux Windows	server-less
Data scheme	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	yes	yes
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	optional	yes short, integer, long, float, double, decimal, string	Numeric data only	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	yes	no	no Import of XML data possible	no
Secondary indexes	yes	no	no	yes
SQL Support of SQL	no	SQL-like query language	no	yes
APIs and other access methods	LDAP	JDBC Proprietary protocol (Network API) RESTful HTTP API	RESTful HTTP/JSON API
Supported programming languages	All languages with LDAP bindings	Go Java PHP Python R Ruby	.Net C++ Go Haskell Java JavaScript (Node.js) Python Ruby
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	yes	no	no
Triggers	yes	yes	no	yes
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	Sharding cell division	Sharding	Sharding	none
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	yes	Source-replica replication	yes by Federation	none
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods		yes	no	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration		none
Foreign keys Referential integrity	no	no	no	yes
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	no	ACID
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.	yes		no	yes
User concepts Access control	LDAP bind authentication		no	no
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Atos Standard Common Repository	Axibase	Prometheus	SpatiaLite
DB-Engines blog posts				Spatial database management systems 6 April 2021, Matthias Gelbmann show all
Recent citations in the news		The Ultimate ATV Test: Suzuki's King Quad 750 AXI Rugged Package vs. Alaska's Hunting Season 14 October 2020, Outdoor Life Time Series Databases Software Market - A comprehensive study 6 February 2020, openPR provided by Google News	VTEX scales to 150 million metrics using Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus | Amazon Web Services 10 March 2024, AWS Blog Exadata Real-Time Insight - Quick Start 3 April 2024, Oracle OpenTelemetry vs. Prometheus: You can’t fix what you can’t see 29 March 2024, IBM VictoriaMetrics Offers Prometheus Replacement for Time Series Monitoring 17 July 2023, The New Stack Linux System Monitoring with Prometheus, Grafana, and collectd 1 February 2024, Linux Journal provided by Google News

Share this page