DBMS > Apache HugeGraph vs. CrateDB vs. Percona Server for MongoDB

System Properties Comparison Apache HugeGraph vs. CrateDB vs. Percona Server for MongoDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A fast-speed and highly-scalable Graph DBMS

Distributed Database based on Lucene

A drop-in replacement for MongoDB Community Edition with enterprise-grade features.

Primary database model

Graph DBMS

Document store
Spatial DBMS
Search engine
Time Series DBMS
Vector DBMS

Document store

Secondary database models

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.17
Rank	#321	Overall
	#30	Graph DBMS

Score	0.69
Rank	#226	Overall
	#37	Document stores
	#5	Spatial DBMS
	#16	Search engines
	#19	Time Series DBMS
	#11	Vector DBMS

Score	0.50
Rank	#250	Overall
	#39	Document stores

Website

github.com/hugegraph
hugegraph.apache.org

cratedb.com

www.percona.com/mongodb/software/percona-server-for-mongodb

Technical documentation

hugegraph.apache.org/docs

cratedb.com/docs

docs.percona.com/percona-distribution-for-mongodb

Developer

Baidu

Crate

Percona

Initial release

2018

2013

2015

Current release

0.9

5.8.1, August 2024

3.4.10-2.10, November 2017

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

Open Source

GPL Version 2

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C++

Server operating systems

Linux
macOS
Unix

All Operating Systems, including Kubernetes with CrateDB Kubernetes Operator support

Linux

Data scheme

yes

Flexible Schema (defined schema, partial schema, schema free)

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

also supports composite index and range index

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes, but no triggers and constraints, and PostgreSQL compatibility

APIs and other access methods

Java API
RESTful HTTP API
TinkerPop Gremlin

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
PostgreSQL wire protocol
Prometheus Remote Read/Write
RESTful HTTP API

proprietary protocol using JSON

Supported programming languages

Groovy
Java
Python

.NET
Erlang
Go

community maintained client
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)

community maintained client
Perl

community maintained client
PHP
Python
R
Ruby

community maintained client
Scala

community maintained client

Actionscript
C
C#
C++
Clojure
ColdFusion
D
Dart
Delphi
Erlang
Go
Groovy
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
Lisp
Lua
MatLab
Perl
PHP
PowerShell
Prolog
Python
R
Ruby
Scala
Smalltalk

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

asynchronous Gremlin script jobs

user defined functions (Javascript)

JavaScript

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

yes

depending on used storage backend, e.g. Cassandra and HBase

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

depending on used storage backend, e.g. Cassandra and HBase

Configurable replication on table/partition-level

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

via hugegraph-spark

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency

Eventual Consistency
Read-after-write consistency on record level

Eventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

edges in graph

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

unique row identifiers can be used for implementing an optimistic concurrency control strategy

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

via In-Memory Engine

User concepts

Access control

Users, roles and permissions

rights management via user accounts

Access rights for users and roles

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Critical Apache HugeGraph Vulnerability Under Attack - Patch ASAP
17 July 2024, The Hacker News

POC exploit code published for 9.8-rated Apache HugeGraph RCE flaw
7 June 2024, The Register

Apache HugeGraph Vulnerability Exploited in Wild
17 July 2024, SecurityWeek

Critical Apache HugeGraph Flaw Under Attack | Decipher
16 July 2024, duo.com

Decoding the HugeGraph Vulnerability (CVE-2024-27348)
17 July 2024, The Cyber Express

provided by Google News

CrateDB Appoints Jeff Olson as New CRO
9 July 2024, PR Newswire

CrateDB Announces Availability of CrateDB on Google Cloud Marketplace
8 April 2024, Datanami

CrateDB Appoints Sergey Gerasimenko as New CTO
19 February 2024, PR Newswire

Crate.io raises $10M to grow its database platform
15 June 2021, VentureBeat

How We Designed CrateDB as a Realtime SQL DBMS for the Internet of Things
29 August 2017, The New Stack

provided by Google News

MongoDB Performance Tuning
23 May 2024, Database Trends and Applications

MySQL Leader Percona Takes Aim at MongoDB
14 April 2015, Datanami

Percona launches management system aimed at open-source databases
17 May 2022, The Register

The essential guide to MongoDB security
2 February 2017, InfoWorld

Is database-as-a-service in Percona’s future?
23 May 2022, VentureBeat

provided by Google News

Share this page