DBMS > Amazon Neptune vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Axibase vs. TempoIQ

System Properties Comparison Amazon Neptune vs. Atos Standard Common Repository vs. Axibase vs. TempoIQ

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
Name	Amazon Neptune  Xexclude from comparison	Atos Standard Common Repository  Xexclude from comparison	Axibase  Xexclude from comparison	TempoIQ formerly TempoDB  Xexclude from comparison
		This system has been discontinued and will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.		TempoIQ seems to be decommissioned. It will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.
Description	Fast, reliable graph database built for the cloud	Highly scalable database system, designed for managing session and subscriber data in modern mobile communication networks	Scalable TimeSeries DBMS based on HBase with integrated rule engine and visualization	Scalable analytics DBMS for sensor data, provided as a service (SaaS)
Primary database model	Graph DBMS RDF store	Document store Key-value store	Time Series DBMS	Time Series DBMS
DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems Trend Chart	Score 2.29 Rank #113   Overall #9   Graph DBMS #5   RDF stores		Score 0.35 Rank #282   Overall #25   Time Series DBMS
Website	aws.amazon.com/­neptune	atos.net/en/convergence-creators/portfolio/standard-common-repository	axibase.com/­docs/­atsd/­finance	tempoiq.com (offline)
Technical documentation	aws.amazon.com/­neptune/­developer-resources
Developer	Amazon	Atos Convergence Creators	Axibase Corporation	TempoIQ
Initial release	2017	2016	2013	2012
Current release		1703	15585
License Commercial or Open Source	commercial	commercial	commercial Community Edition (single node) is free, Enterprise Edition (distributed) is paid	commercial
Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service	yes	no	no	yes
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation language		Java	Java
Server operating systems	hosted	Linux	Linux
Data scheme	schema-free	Schema and schema-less with LDAP views	yes	schema-free
Typing predefined data types such as float or date	yes	optional	yes short, integer, long, float, double, decimal, string	yes
XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.	no	yes	no	no
Secondary indexes	no	yes	no
SQL Support of SQL	no	no	SQL-like query language	no
APIs and other access methods	OpenCypher RDF 1.1 / SPARQL 1.1 TinkerPop Gremlin	LDAP	JDBC Proprietary protocol (Network API) RESTful HTTP API	HTTP API
Supported programming languages	C# Go Java JavaScript PHP Python Ruby Scala	All languages with LDAP bindings	Go Java PHP Python R Ruby	C# Java JavaScript Node.js Python Ruby
Server-side scripts Stored procedures	no	no	yes	no
Triggers	no	yes	yes	yes Realtime Alerts
Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes	none	Sharding cell division	Sharding
Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes	Multi-availability zones high availability, asynchronous replication for up to 15 read replicas within a single region. Global database clusters consists of a primary write DB cluster in one region, and up to five secondary read DB clusters in different regions. Each secondary region can have up to 16 reader instances.	yes	Source-replica replication
MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods	no		yes	no
Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system	Immediate Consistency	Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration
Foreign keys Referential integrity	yes Relationships in graphs	no	no	no
Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data	ACID	Atomic execution of specific operations	no	no
Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data	yes	yes	yes	yes
Durability Support for making data persistent	yes with encyption-at-rest	yes	yes	yes
In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.		yes		no
User concepts Access control	Access rights for users and roles can be defined via the AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)	LDAP bind authentication		simple authentication-based access control
More information provided by the system vendor We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information, and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.
Related products and services We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
More resources
	Amazon Neptune	Atos Standard Common Repository	Axibase	TempoIQ formerly TempoDB
Recent citations in the news	Exploring new features of Apache TinkerPop 3.7.x in Amazon Neptune | Amazon Web Services 7 June 2024, AWS Blog Building NHM London's Planetary Knowledge Base with Amazon Neptune and the Registry of Open Data on AWS ... 5 June 2024, AWS Blog Unit testing Apache TinkerPop transactions: From TinkerGraph to Amazon Neptune | Amazon Web Services 3 June 2024, AWS Blog AWS announces Amazon Neptune I/O-Optimized 22 February 2024, AWS Blog Amazon Neptune Analytics is now available in the AWS Europe (London) Region 14 March 2024, AWS Blog provided by Google News		The Ultimate ATV Test: Suzuki's King Quad 750 AXI Rugged Package vs. Alaska's Hunting Season 14 October 2020, Outdoor Life Time Series Databases Software Market - A comprehensive study 6 February 2020, openPR provided by Google News

Share this page