DBMS > etcd vs. XTDB

System Properties Comparison etcd vs. XTDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare etcd and XTDB with Amazon DynamoDB, RocksDB and Google Cloud Spanner.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A distributed reliable key-value store

A general purpose database with bitemporal SQL and Datalog and graph queries

Primary database model

Key-value store

Document store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	7.14
Rank	#47	Overall
	#5	Key-value stores

Score	0.20
Rank	#314	Overall
	#46	Document stores

Website

etcd.io
github.com/etcd-io/etcd

github.com/xtdb/xtdb
www.xtdb.com

Technical documentation

etcd.io/docs
github.com/etcd-io/etcd/tree/master/Documentation

www.xtdb.com/docs

Developer

Juxt Ltd.

Initial release

2019

Current release

3.4, August 2019

1.19, September 2021

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

Open Source

MIT License

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Clojure

Server operating systems

FreeBSD
Linux
Windows

experimental

All OS with a Java 8 (and higher) VM
Linux

Data scheme

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes, extensible-data-notation format

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

limited SQL, making use of Apache Calcite

APIs and other access methods

gRPC
JSON over HTTP

HTTP REST
JDBC

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C++
Clojure
Erlang
Go
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Rust
Scala
Tcl

Clojure
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Triggers

yes, watching key changes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Using Raft consensus algorithm to ensure data replication with strong consistency among multiple replicas.

yes, each node contains all data

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

yes, flexibel persistency by using storage technologies like Apache Kafka, RocksDB or LMDB

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

User concepts

Access control

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

etcd gets ready to graduate
17 November 2020, Amazon Web Services (AWS)

How to restore a Kubernetes cluster from an etcd snapshot
16 December 2021, TechTarget

A Kubernetes Operator for etcd
13 October 2020, infoq.com

Scaling Kubernetes to 2,500 nodes
18 January 2018, OpenAI

ETCD guidelines: RBI seeks to balance rupee stability, competitiveness | Policy Circle
8 April 2024, policycircle.org

provided by Google News

Share this page