DBMS > TinkerGraph vs. Transwarp ArgoDB vs. Yaacomo

System Properties Comparison TinkerGraph vs. Transwarp ArgoDB vs. Yaacomo

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Yaacomo seems to be discontinued and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking

Description

A lightweight, in-memory graph engine that serves as a reference implementation of the TinkerPop3 API

Distributed Analytical Database to replace Hadoop+MPP hybrid architecture

OpenCL based in-memory RDBMS, designed for efficiently utilizing the hardware via parallel computing

Primary database model

Graph DBMS

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Search engine

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.05
Rank	#356	Overall
	#37	Graph DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#385	Overall
	#157	Relational DBMS

Website

tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/reference/#tinkergraph-gremlin

www.transwarp.cn/en/product/argodb

yaacomo.com

Technical documentation

docs.transwarp.cn/#/documents-support/docs?category=ARGODB

Developer

Transwarp

Q2WEB GmbH

Initial release

2009

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache 2.0

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

Android
Linux
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

APIs and other access methods

TinkerPop 3

JDBC
ODBC

Supported programming languages

Groovy
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

horizontal partitioning

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

none

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

none

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Relationships in graphs

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

optional

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Unit testing Apache TinkerPop transactions: From TinkerGraph to Amazon Neptune
3 June 2024, Amazon Web Services

Automated testing of Amazon Neptune data access with Apache TinkerPop Gremlin
28 September 2022, Amazon Web Services

Figure 6: Performance of Dijkstra's algorithm in Property Graph...
7 February 2018, ResearchGate

Exploring new features of Apache TinkerPop 3.7.x in Amazon Neptune
7 June 2024, Amazon Web Services

Introducing Gremlin query hints for Amazon Neptune
26 February 2019, Amazon Web Services

provided by Google News

Share this page