DBMS > TimesTen vs. Ultipa vs. Yanza

System Properties Comparison TimesTen vs. Ultipa vs. Yanza

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Yanza seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.

Description

In-Memory RDBMS compatible to Oracle

High performance Graph DBMS supporting HTAP high availability cluster deployment

Time Series DBMS for IoT Applications

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Graph DBMS

Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.74
Rank	#162	Overall
	#76	Relational DBMS

Score	0.25
Rank	#334	Overall
	#32	Graph DBMS

Website

www.oracle.com/database/technologies/related/timesten.html

www.ultipa.com

yanza.com

Technical documentation

docs.oracle.com/database/timesten-18.1

www.ultipa.com/document

Developer

Oracle, TimesTen Performance Software, HP

originally founded in HP Labs it was acquired by Oracle in 2005

Ultipa

Yanza

Initial release

1998

2019

2015

Current release

11 Release 2 (11.2.2.8.0)

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

free version available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

but mainly used as a service provided by Yanza

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Server operating systems

AIX
HP-UX
Linux
OS X
Solaris SPARC/x86
Windows

Windows

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
ODBC
ODP.NET
Oracle Call Interface (OCI)

RESTful HTTP API

HTTP API

Supported programming languages

C
C++
Java
PL/SQL

C++
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python

any language that supports HTTP calls

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

PL/SQL

Triggers

yes

Timer and event based

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

by means of logfiles and checkpoints

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Ultipa release v4 of its flagship real-time graph database
18 May 2023, PR Web

Ultipa appoints Yuri Simione as Director of Sales, EMEA
28 October 2022, PR Web

Ultipa Selected as a 2022 Red Herring Top 100 Global Winner
16 November 2022, PR Web

EPiC 2023: Fintechs Plotting Asia Expansion Hit the Elevator in ...
28 April 2023, The Fintech Times

Graph database: ecco i vantaggi e perché usarli in azienda
30 March 2023, Agenda Digitale

provided by Google News

Share this page