DBMS > SiteWhere vs. TigerGraph

System Properties Comparison SiteWhere vs. TigerGraph

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare SiteWhere and TigerGraph with Citus, MongoDB and TiDB.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

M2M integration platform for persisting/querying time series data

A complete, distributed, parallel graph computing platform supporting web-scale data analytics in real-time

Primary database model

Time Series DBMS

Graph DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.07
Rank	#346	Overall
	#34	Time Series DBMS

Score	1.42
Rank	#149	Overall
	#14	Graph DBMS

Website

github.com/sitewhere/sitewhere

www.tigergraph.com

Technical documentation

sitewhere1.sitewhere.io/index.html

docs.tigergraph.com

Developer

SiteWhere

Initial release

2010

2017

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Common Public Attribution License Version 1.0

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C++

Server operating systems

Linux
OS X
Windows

Linux

Data scheme

predefined scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like query language (GSQL)

APIs and other access methods

HTTP REST

GSQL (TigerGraph Query Language)
Kafka
RESTful HTTP/JSON API

Supported programming languages

C++
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

based on HBase

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

selectable replication factor

based on HBase

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Relationships in graphs

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

User concepts

Access control

Users with fine-grained authorization concept

Role-based access control

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

SiteWhere: An open platform for connected devices
11 July 2017, Open Source For You

Top Open-Source Tools for IoT Development in 2024
5 September 2024, Analytics Insight

11 Best Open source IoT Platforms To Develop Smart Projects
9 March 2023, H2S Media

provided by Google News

TigerGraph Unveils Next Generation Hybrid Search to its
4 March 2025, GlobeNewswire

TigerGraph revs up its graph database offering with faster setup times and new preconfigurations
21 January 2025, SiliconANGLE

A growl from the graph, TigerGraph prowls Savanna for smarter AI
22 January 2025, techzine.eu

TigerGraph launches Savanna to aid AI development
21 January 2025, TechTarget

TigerGraph offers enhanced hybrid search with its graph database to power AI at scale
5 March 2025, KMWorld

provided by Google News

Share this page