DBMS > SiriDB vs. Transbase vs. Yaacomo

System Properties Comparison SiriDB vs. Transbase vs. Yaacomo

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Open Source Time Series DBMS

A resource-optimized, high-performance, universally applicable RDBMS

OpenCL based in-memory RDBMS, designed for efficiently utilizing the hardware via parallel computing

Primary database model

Time Series DBMS

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.17
Rank	#357	Overall
	#33	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.51
Rank	#274	Overall
	#126	Relational DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#389	Overall
	#160	Relational DBMS

Website

siridb.com

www.transaction.de/en/products/transbase.html

yaacomo.com

Technical documentation

docs.siridb.com

www.transaction.de/en/products/transbase/features.html

Developer

Cesbit

Transaction Software GmbH

Q2WEB GmbH

Initial release

2017

1987

2009

Current release

Transbase 8.3, 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

MIT License

commercial

free development license

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C and C++

Server operating systems

Linux

FreeBSD
Linux
macOS
Solaris
Windows

Android
Linux
Windows

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

Numeric data

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

APIs and other access methods

HTTP API

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
Proprietary native API

JDBC
ODBC

Supported programming languages

C
C++
Go
Python

C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Objective-C
PHP
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

horizontal partitioning

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

yes

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

simple rights management via user accounts

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

One City's Proposed E-Scooter Ultimatum: No Sidewalks or No ...
20 September 2022, Route Fifty

Economic and biophysical limits to seaweed farming for climate ...
23 December 2022, Nature.com

SF Mulls Strict New Rules to Keep Scooters Off Sidewalks
12 September 2022, The San Francisco Standard

provided by Google News

Staying power: the growing impact of PostgreSQL on enterprise ...
15 June 2021, SiliconANGLE News

provided by Google News

Share this page