DBMS > SiriDB vs. TempoIQ vs. Yaacomo

System Properties Comparison SiriDB vs. TempoIQ vs. Yaacomo

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

TempoIQ seems to be decommissioned. It will be removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Open Source Time Series DBMS

Scalable analytics DBMS for sensor data, provided as a service (SaaS)

OpenCL based in-memory RDBMS, designed for efficiently utilizing the hardware via parallel computing

Primary database model

Time Series DBMS

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.17
Rank	#357	Overall
	#33	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#389	Overall
	#160	Relational DBMS

Website

siridb.com

tempoiq.com (offline)

yaacomo.com

Technical documentation

docs.siridb.com

Developer

Cesbit

TempoIQ

Q2WEB GmbH

Initial release

2017

2012

2009

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

MIT License

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Server operating systems

Linux

Android
Linux
Windows

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

Numeric data

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

APIs and other access methods

HTTP API

JDBC
ODBC

Supported programming languages

C
C++
Go
Python

C#
Java
JavaScript

Node.js
Python
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Triggers

yes

Realtime Alerts

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

horizontal partitioning

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

simple rights management via user accounts

simple authentication-based access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Tech roundup: 1871 unveils 3.0 expansion, Avant's acqui-hires, and ...
21 April 2016, Built In Chicago

Hyde Park Venture Partners announces $65 million fund
31 August 2016, Chicago Tribune

IIoT and Cloud Computing Market to Witness Huge Growth by 2029 -XMPro, Siemens AG, Bosch, IBM
19 February 2023, openPR

Spillover effect: Oil price crash bankrupting 'small oil'
12 January 2015, CNBC

The Industrial IoT: Startups Transforming Factory Floors, Oil Fields ...
20 January 2016, LinkedIn

provided by Google News

Share this page