DBMS > SAP Advantage Database Server vs. Valentina Server vs. Yaacomo

System Properties Comparison SAP Advantage Database Server vs. Valentina Server vs. Yaacomo

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Low-cost RDBMS with access to ISAM and FoxPro data structures

Object-relational database and reports server

OpenCL based in-memory RDBMS, designed for efficiently utilizing the hardware via parallel computing

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	2.98
Rank	#111	Overall
	#56	Relational DBMS

Score	0.40
Rank	#299	Overall
	#138	Relational DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#389	Overall
	#162	Relational DBMS

Website

www.sap.com/products/advantage-database-server.html

www.valentina-db.net

yaacomo.com

Technical documentation

valentina-db.com/docs/dokuwiki/v5/doku.php

Developer

Sybase, SAP

Paradigma Software

Q2WEB GmbH

Initial release

1993

1999

2009

Current release

5.7.5

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

Linux
OS X
Windows

Android
Linux
Windows

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

APIs and other access methods

.NET Client API
ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
OLE DB

ODBC

JDBC
ODBC

Supported programming languages

Delphi
Perl
PHP

.Net
C
C#
C++
Objective-C
PHP
Ruby
Visual Basic
Visual Basic.NET

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

horizontal partitioning

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Multi-source replication

CONFLICT Trigger to resolve replication conflicts
Source-replica replication

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

caching of (temporary) tables can be configured

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

A Look at Valentina — SitePoint
18 April 2014, SitePoint

MySQL GUI Tools for Windows and Ubuntu/Linux: Top 8 free or ...
7 November 2019, H2S Media

provided by Google News

Staying power: the growing impact of PostgreSQL on enterprise ...
15 June 2021, SiliconANGLE News

provided by Google News

Share this page