DBMS > RocksDB vs. SiteWhere

System Properties Comparison RocksDB vs. SiteWhere

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare RocksDB and SiteWhere with MongoDB, InfluxDB and OpenSearch.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Embeddable persistent key-value store optimized for fast storage (flash and RAM)

M2M integration platform for persisting/querying time series data

Primary database model

Key-value store

Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	3.05
Rank	#88	Overall
	#12	Key-value stores

Score	0.07
Rank	#345	Overall
	#31	Time Series DBMS

Website

rocksdb.org

github.com/sitewhere/sitewhere

Technical documentation

github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki

sitewhere1.sitewhere.io/index.html

Developer

Facebook, Inc.

SiteWhere

Initial release

2013

2010

Current release

9.4.0, June 2024

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

BSD

Open Source

Common Public Attribution License Version 1.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

Java

Server operating systems

Linux

Linux
OS X
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

predefined scheme

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

SQL

Support of SQL

APIs and other access methods

C++ API
Java API

HTTP REST

Supported programming languages

C
C++
Go
Java
Perl
Python
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

horizontal partitioning

Sharding

based on HBase

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

selectable replication factor

based on HBase

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

yes

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Users with fine-grained authorization concept

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

CORRECTING and REPLACING Kioxia Demonstrates Flexible Data Placement-Enabled SSD Running RocksDB at 2024 OCP Global Summit
18 October 2024, Business Wire

Correcting And Replacing Kioxia Demonstrates Flexible Data Placement-Enabled SSD Running RocksDB at 2024 OCP Global Summit
21 October 2024, BERNAMA

KIOXIA Demonstrates Flexible Data Placement-Enabled SSD Running RocksDB at 2024 OCP Global Summit
14 October 2024, Business Wire

provided by Google News

SiteWhere: An open platform for connected devices
11 July 2017, Open Source For You

Top Open-Source Tools for IoT Development in 2024
5 September 2024, Analytics Insight

provided by Google News

Share this page