DBMS > RDFox vs. TinkerGraph

System Properties Comparison RDFox vs. TinkerGraph

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare RDFox and TinkerGraph with GraphDB, Stardog and Neo4j.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

High performance knowledge graph and semantic reasoning engine

A lightweight, in-memory graph engine that serves as a reference implementation of the TinkerPop3 API

Primary database model

Graph DBMS
RDF store

Graph DBMS

Secondary database models

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.42
Rank	#298	Overall
	#26	Graph DBMS
	#15	RDF stores

Score	0.29
Rank	#326	Overall
	#30	Graph DBMS

Website

www.oxfordsemantic.tech

tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/reference/#tinkergraph-gremlin

Technical documentation

docs.oxfordsemantic.tech

Developer

Oxford Semantic Technologies

Initial release

2017

2009

Current release

6.0, Septermber 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

Java

Server operating systems

Linux
macOS
Windows

Data scheme

yes

RDF schemas

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

SQL

Support of SQL

APIs and other access methods

RESTful HTTP API
SPARQL 1.1

TinkerPop 3

Supported programming languages

C
Java

Groovy
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

replication via a shared file system

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency in stand-alone mode, Eventual Consistency in replicated setups

none

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Relationships in graphs

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

optional

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Roles, resources, and access types

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Eight interesting open-source graph databases
3 January 2023, INDIAai

Top 9 Open Source Graph Databases
7 November 2022, Analytics India Magazine

Red Bull sticks with matte livery
18 February 2019, pitpass.com

How America Covers F1
2 January 2017, pitpass.com

Verstappen ordered to perform public service following Ocon clash
11 November 2018, pitpass.com

provided by Google News

Gremlin, a Language for Working with Graphs
15 January 2010, InfoQ.com

Graph Databases, NOSQL and Neo4j
12 May 2010, InfoQ.com

Gremlin:グラフを扱う言語
19 January 2010, InfoQ.com

provided by Google News

Share this page