DBMS > Prometheus vs. STSdb vs. Transwarp KunDB

System Properties Comparison Prometheus vs. STSdb vs. Transwarp KunDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Open-source Time Series DBMS and monitoring system

Key-Value Store with special method for indexing

optimized for high performance using a special indexing method

OLTP DBMS based on a distributed architecture and highly compatible with MySQL and Oracle

Primary database model

Time Series DBMS

Key-value store

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	7.31
Rank	#50	Overall
	#3	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.03
Rank	#363	Overall
	#54	Key-value stores

Score	0.01
Rank	#374	Overall
	#158	Relational DBMS

Website

prometheus.io

github.com/STSSoft/STSdb4

www.transwarp.cn/en/product/kundb

Technical documentation

prometheus.io/docs

Developer

STS Soft SC

Transwarp

Initial release

2015

2011

Current release

4.0.8, September 2015

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Open Source

GPLv2, commercial license available

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

Windows

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

Numeric data only

yes

primitive types and user defined types (classes)

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Import of XML data possible

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

APIs and other access methods

RESTful HTTP/JSON API

.NET Client API

Supported programming languages

.Net
C++
Go
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python
Ruby

C#
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

none

horizontal partitioning

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

by Federation

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

none

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

User concepts

Access control

yes

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Introducing the Amazon Timestream for LiveAnalytics Prometheus Connector
8 July 2024, AWS Blog

How to Monitor an Ubuntu Server With Prometheus: Collecting and Visualizing System Metrics
9 July 2024, Linux Journal

How Cloudflare runs Prometheus at scale
3 March 2023, The Cloudflare Blog

VTEX scales to 150 million metrics using Amazon Managed Service for Prometheus
10 March 2024, AWS Blog

Consider Grafana vs. Prometheus for your time-series tools
18 October 2021, TechTarget

provided by Google News

Share this page