DBMS > etcd vs. OrigoDB

System Properties Comparison etcd vs. OrigoDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare etcd and OrigoDB with Elasticsearch, Microsoft SQL Server and TimescaleDB.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A distributed reliable key-value store

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

Primary database model

Key-value store

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	7.08
Rank	#49	Overall
	#5	Key-value stores

Score	0.00
Rank	#389	Overall
	#54	Document stores
	#20	Object oriented DBMS

Website

etcd.io
github.com/etcd-io/etcd

origodb.com

Technical documentation

etcd.io/docs
github.com/etcd-io/etcd/tree/master/Documentation

origodb.com/docs

Developer

Robert Friberg et al

Initial release

2009

under the name LiveDB

Current release

3.4, August 2019

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

Open Source

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Server operating systems

FreeBSD
Linux
Windows

experimental

Linux
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

User defined using .NET types and collections

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

can be achieved using .NET

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

APIs and other access methods

gRPC
JSON over HTTP

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C++
Clojure
Erlang
Go
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Rust
Scala
Tcl

.Net

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes, watching key changes

yes

Domain Events

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Using Raft consensus algorithm to ensure data replication with strong consistency among multiple replicas.

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

depending on model

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Write ahead log

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Role based authorization

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

etcd gets ready to graduate
17 November 2020, AWS Blog

ETCD guidelines: RBI seeks to balance rupee stability, competitiveness | Policy Circle
8 April 2024, Policy Circle

How to restore a Kubernetes cluster from an etcd snapshot
16 December 2021, TechTarget

A Kubernetes Operator for etcd
13 October 2020, InfoQ.com

Provision k8s to bare metal. I’ve got some mini PCs that I want to… | by Alex Persinger
25 November 2023, Medium

provided by Google News

Share this page