DBMS > atoti vs. Oracle Berkeley DB

System Properties Comparison atoti vs. Oracle Berkeley DB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare atoti and Oracle Berkeley DB with H2, DuckDB and MySQL.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

An in-memory DBMS combining transactional and analytical processing to handle the aggregation of ever-changing data.

Widely used in-process key-value store

Primary database model

Object oriented DBMS

Key-value store

supports sorted and unsorted key sets
Native XML DBMS

in the Oracle Berkeley DB XML version

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.48
Rank	#246	Overall
	#11	Object oriented DBMS

Score	1.71
Rank	#129	Overall
	#21	Key-value stores
	#3	Native XML DBMS

Website

atoti.io

www.oracle.com/database/technologies/related/berkeleydb.html

Technical documentation

docs.atoti.io

docs.oracle.com/cd/E17076_05/html/index.html

Developer

ActiveViam

Oracle

originally developed by Sleepycat, which was acquired by Oracle

Initial release

1994

Current release

18.1.40, May 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

free versions available

Open Source

commercial license available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C, Java, C++ (depending on the Berkeley DB edition)

Server operating systems

AIX
Android
FreeBSD
iOS
Linux
OS X
Solaris
VxWorks
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

only with the Berkeley DB XML edition

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

Multidimensional Expressions (MDX)

yes

SQL interfaced based on SQLite is available

Supported programming languages

.Net

Figaro is a .Net framework assembly that extends Berkeley DB XML into an embeddable database engine for .NET
others

Third-party libraries to manipulate Berkeley DB files are available for many languages
C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)

3rd party binding
Perl
Python
Tcl

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Python

Triggers

yes

only for the SQL API

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding, horizontal partitioning

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes, multi-version concurrency control (MVCC)

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

FRTB product of the year: ActiveViam
28 November 2023, Risk.net

ActiveViam Announces Leadership Succession
4 September 2024, Business Wire

provided by Google News

Recognition For NoSQL Pioneers
5 July 2021, i-programmer.info

ACM recognizes far-reaching technical achievements with special awards
26 May 2021, EurekAlert!

What is NoSQL (Not Only SQL database)?
28 February 2022, TechTarget

Which Are the Top Local Databases for React Native
15 October 2019, appinventiv.com

Database Trends Report: SQL Beats NoSQL, MySQL Most Popular
5 March 2019, ADTmag

provided by Google News

Share this page