DBMS > etcd vs. OpenEdge

System Properties Comparison etcd vs. OpenEdge

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare etcd and OpenEdge with PostgreSQL, MongoDB and MySQL.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A distributed reliable key-value store

Application development environment with integrated database management system

Primary database model

Key-value store

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	7.05
Rank	#50	Overall
	#5	Key-value stores

Score	3.46
Rank	#74	Overall
	#39	Relational DBMS

Website

etcd.io
github.com/etcd-io/etcd

www.progress.com/openedge

Technical documentation

etcd.io/docs
github.com/etcd-io/etcd/tree/master/Documentation

documentation.progress.com/output/ua/OpenEdge_latest

Developer

Progress Software Corporation

Initial release

1984

Current release

3.4, August 2019

OpenEdge 12.2, March 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Server operating systems

FreeBSD
Linux
Windows

experimental

AIX
HP-UX
Linux
Solaris
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

close to SQL 92

APIs and other access methods

gRPC
JSON over HTTP

JDBC
ODBC

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C++
Clojure
Erlang
Go
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Rust
Scala
Tcl

Progress proprietary ABL (Advanced Business Language)

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes, watching key changes

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

horizontal partitioning

since Version 11.4

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Using Raft consensus algorithm to ensure data replication with strong consistency among multiple replicas.

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

User concepts

Access control

Users and groups

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

etcd gets ready to graduate
17 November 2020, Amazon Web Services (AWS)

How to restore a Kubernetes cluster from an etcd snapshot
16 December 2021, TechTarget

A Kubernetes Operator for etcd
13 October 2020, infoq.com

ETCD guidelines: RBI seeks to balance rupee stability, competitiveness | Policy Circle
8 April 2024, policycircle.org

Scaling Kubernetes to 2,500 nodes
18 January 2018, OpenAI

provided by Google News

What's New in OpenEdge 12.8
15 April 2024, Release.nl

provided by Google News

Share this page