DBMS > Netezza vs. Sequoiadb

System Properties Comparison Netezza vs. Sequoiadb

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare Netezza and Sequoiadb with Databricks, ScyllaDB and MySQL.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Data warehouse and analytics appliance part of IBM PureSystems

NewSQL database with distributed OLTP and SQL

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Document store
Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	6.45
Rank	#53	Overall
	#32	Relational DBMS

Score	0.37
Rank	#269	Overall
	#43	Document stores
	#124	Relational DBMS

Website

www.ibm.com/products/netezza

www.sequoiadb.com

Technical documentation

www.sequoiadb.com/en/index.php?m=Files&a=index

Developer

IBM

Sequoiadb Ltd.

Initial release

2000

2013

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Server: AGPL; Client: Apache V2

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

Server operating systems

Linux

included in appliance

Linux

Data scheme

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

oid, date, timestamp, binary, regex

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL-like query language

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
ODBC
OLE DB

proprietary protocol using JSON

Supported programming languages

C
C++
Fortran
Java
Lua
Perl
Python
R

.Net
C++
Java
PHP
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

JavaScript

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Document is locked during a transaction

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

User concepts

Access control

Users with fine-grained authorization concept

simple password-based access control

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Netezza and IBM Cloud Pak for Data: A knockout combo for tough data
15 January 2025, IBM

How to use Netezza Performance Server query data in Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
20 December 2024, IBM

Fig. 2: IDAA System Architecture and its Integration into DB2 for zOS
23 October 2024, ResearchGate

How to migrate a large data warehouse from IBM Netezza to Amazon Redshift with no downtime
21 August 2019, AWS Blog

Unify and share data across Netezza and watsonx.data for new generative AI applications
21 June 2024, IBM

provided by Google News

Continuously recognized by Gartner and Forrester, SequoiaDB consolidates its leading position in China's distributed database market
9 March 2023, PR Newswire

SequoiaDB's Innovative Solutions in Distributed Databases Earns IDC Recognition
17 March 2023, 美通社

provided by Google News

Share this page