DBMS > Microsoft SQL Server vs. ToroDB
System Properties Comparison Microsoft SQL Server vs. ToroDB
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Microsoft SQL Server Xexclude from comparison||ToroDB Xexclude from comparison|
|Description||Microsofts flagship relational DBMS||A MongoDB-compatible JSON document store, built on top of PostgreSQL|
|Primary database model||Relational DBMS||Document store|
|Secondary database models||Document store|
|Current release||SQL Server 2019, November 2019|
|License Commercial or Open Source||commercial restricted free version is available||Open Source AGPL-V3|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Server operating systems||Linux|
|All OS with a Java 7 VM|
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||yes||yes string, integer, double, boolean, date, object_id|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||yes||no|
|SQL Support of SQL||yes|
|APIs and other access methods||ADO.NET|
Tabular Data Stream (TDS)
|Supported programming languages||C#|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||Transact SQL, .NET languages, R, Python and (with SQL Server 2019) Java|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||tables can be distributed across several files (horizontal partitioning); sharding through federation||Sharding|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||yes, but depending on the SQL-Server Edition||Source-replica replication|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Immediate Consistency||Eventual Consistency|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||yes||no|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||ACID||no|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||yes|
|User concepts Access control||fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard||Access rights for users and roles|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
|Related products and services|
|3rd parties||Navicat Monitor is a safe, simple and agentless remote server monitoring tool for SQL Server and many other database management systems.|
SQLFlow: Provides a visual representation of the overall flow of data. Automated SQL data lineage analysis across Databases, ETL, Business Intelligence, Cloud and Hadoop environments by parsing SQL Script and stored procedure.
Navicat for SQL Server gives you a fully graphical approach to database management and development.
Fivetran: Quickly and easily centralize your on-premise and cloud databases.
DBHawk: Secure access to SQL, NoSQL and Cloud databases with an all-in-one solution.
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|Microsoft SQL Server||ToroDB|
|DB-Engines blog posts|
MySQL is the DBMS of the Year 2019 The struggle for the hegemony in Oracle's database empire
The struggle for the hegemony in Oracle's database empire
|Recent citations in the news|
Introducing SQL Server 2022: Top 3 New Features Announced at Microsoft Ignite
Clumio Protect Expands to Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server 2017 Connector Comes to Google Data Studio
How to Monitor SQL Server Performance: A Guide for DBAs
provided by Google News
SQL Server Support Engineer
SQL Server Developer - Telecommute
SQL Server DBA
Microsoft SQL Server DBA - Chicago, IL
SQL Server Consultant
Share this page