DBMS > Microsoft Access vs. SiriDB
System Properties Comparison Microsoft Access vs. SiriDB
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
Our visitors often compare Microsoft Access and SiriDB with InfluxDB, Redis and Microsoft SQL Server.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Microsoft Access Xexclude from comparison||SiriDB Xexclude from comparison|
|Description||Microsoft Access combines a backend RDBMS (JET / ACE Engine) with a GUI frontend for data manipulation and queries. The Access frontend is often used for accessing other datasources (DBMS, Excel, etc.)||Open Source Time Series DBMS|
|Primary database model||Relational DBMS||Time Series DBMS|
|Current release||1902 (16.0.11328.20222), March 2019|
|License Commercial or Open Source||commercial Bundled with Microsoft Office||Open Source MIT License|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Server operating systems||Windows Not a real database server, but making use of DLLs||Linux|
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||yes||yes Numeric data|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no|
|SQL Support of SQL||yes but not compliant to any SQL standard||no|
|APIs and other access methods||ADO.NET|
|Supported programming languages||C|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||yes since Access 2010 using the ACE-engine||no|
|Triggers||yes since Access 2010 using the ACE-engine||no|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||none||Sharding|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||none||yes|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no||no|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||yes||no|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||ACID but no files for transaction logging||no|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes but no files for transaction logging||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||yes|
|User concepts Access control||no a simple user-level security was built in till version Access 2003||simple rights management via user accounts|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|DB-Engines blog posts|
MS Access drops in DB-Engines Ranking Microsoft SQL Server regained rank 2 in the DB-Engines popularity ranking New DB-Engines Ranking shows the popularity of database management systems
Microsoft SQL Server regained rank 2 in the DB-Engines popularity ranking New DB-Engines Ranking shows the popularity of database management systems
New DB-Engines Ranking shows the popularity of database management systems
|Recent citations in the news|
How to Fix the "Unrecognized Database Format" Error in MS Access?
What is Microsoft Access? An Introductory Guide
Microsoft Access: Is it still relevant in 2023? - Explore Alternatives
Microsoft Access Tutorial: MS Access with Example [Easy Notes]
Build a new MS Access application? In 2023? Really?
provided by Google News
MS Access Programer
MS Access Developer (Contractual)
MS Access Center and Transport Manager
Share this page