DB-EnginesInfluxDB download bannerEnglish
Deutsch
Knowledge Base of Relational and NoSQL Database Management Systemsprovided by solid IT

DBMS > Memgraph vs. ToroDB

System Properties Comparison Memgraph vs. ToroDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare Memgraph and ToroDB with MongoDB and Redis.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines
NameMemgraph  Xexclude from comparisonToroDB  Xexclude from comparison
DescriptionA hybrid, in-memory first, distributed graph DBMS delivering high-performance on analytical and transactional workloads at enterprise scaleA MongoDB-compatible JSON document store, built on top of PostgreSQL
Primary database modelGraph DBMSDocument store
DB-Engines Ranking infomeasures the popularity of database management systemsranking trend
Trend Chart
Score0.14
Rank#294  Overall
#28  Graph DBMS
Score0.04
Rank#318  Overall
#43  Document stores
Websitememgraph.comwww.torodb.com
Technical documentationdocs.memgraph.comwww.torodb.com/­stampede/­docs
DeveloperMemgraph Ltd8Kdata
Initial release20172016
License infoCommercial or Open Sourcecommercial infoFree license availableOpen Source infoAGPL-V3
Cloud-based only infoOnly available as a cloud servicenono
DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) infoDatabase as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
Implementation languageC and C++Java
Server operating systemsLinuxAll OS with a Java 7 VM
Data schemeschema-free and schema-optionalschema-free
Typing infopredefined data types such as float or dateyesyes infostring, integer, double, boolean, date, object_id
XML support infoSome form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.nono
SQL infoSupport of SQLno
APIs and other access methodsBolt protocol
Cypher query language
Supported programming languages.Net
C
C++
Elixir
Go
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scala
Triggersno
Partitioning methods infoMethods for storing different data on different nodesSharding infodynamic graph partitioningSharding
Replication methods infoMethods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodesMulti-source replication using RAFTSource-replica replication
MapReduce infoOffers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methodsno
Consistency concepts infoMethods to ensure consistency in a distributed systemImmediate ConsistencyEventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency
Foreign keys infoReferential integrityyes inforelationships in graphsno
Transaction concepts infoSupport to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of dataACID infowith snapshot isolationno
Concurrency infoSupport for concurrent manipulation of datayes, multi-version concurrency control (MVCC)yes
Durability infoSupport for making data persistentyes infowith periodic snapshot and write-ahead logging (WAL) of changesyes
In-memory capabilities infoIs there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.yes
User concepts infoAccess controlUsers, roles and permissionsAccess rights for users and roles

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources
MemgraphToroDB
Recent citations in the news

Graph Database Market Latest Technological Advancements 2026: IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, AWS, Neo4j, OrientDB, TIBCO, Franz, OpenLink Software, MarkLogic, TigerGraph, DataStax, Ontotext, Stardog, Cray, ArangoDB , Bitnine, Objectivity, Memgraph, Cambridge Semantics, Fluree, and Blazegraph.
22 February 2021, NeighborWebSJ

5 Key Developments Impacting the Global Graph Database Market in 2021-2028 | IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, AWS, Neo4j, OrientDB, TIBCO, Franz, OpenLink Software, MarkLogic, TigerGraph, DataStax, Ontotext, Stardog, Cray, ArangoDB , Bitnine, Objectivity, Memgraph, Cambridge Semantics, Fluree, and Blazegraph. – The Bisouv Network
4 March 2021, The Bisouv Network

Graph Database Market Growth Will Be Sharply Higher By 2026 – NeighborWebSJ
5 February 2021, NeighborWebSJ

Graph database Market 2021 – Industry Size, Trends, Growing Research, Advancements Technological, Growth Projections and Forecast 2027 | IBM, Microsoft, oracle, AWS – The Bisouv Network
4 March 2021, The Bisouv Network

Comprehensive Report on Graph Database Market 2021 | Size, Growth, Demand, Opportunities & Forecast To 2027 | Ibm, Microsoft, Oracle, Aws – NeighborWebSJ
4 March 2021, NeighborWebSJ

provided by Google News




Share this page

Featured Products

Vertica logo

The fastest unified analytical warehouse at extreme scale with in-database Machine Learning. Try Vertica for free with no time limit.

MariaDB logo

SkySQL, the ultimate
MariaDB cloud, is here.

Get started with SkySQL today!

Neo4j logo

Get your free copy of the new O'Reilly book Graph Algorithms with 20+ examples for
machine learning, graph analytics and more.

Datastax Astra logo

Build cloud-native apps fast with Astra, the open-source, multi-cloud stack for
modern data apps.
Get started with 5 GB free..

Couchbase logo

SQL + JSON + NoSQL.
Power, flexibility & scale.
All open source.
Get started now.

Present your product here