DBMS > Linter vs. MaxDB

System Properties Comparison Linter vs. MaxDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare Linter and MaxDB with MySQL, Microsoft SQL Server and PostgreSQL.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

RDBMS for high security requirements

A robust and reliable RDBMS optimized to run all major SAP solutions

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.28
Rank	#316	Overall
	#141	Relational DBMS

Score	3.37
Rank	#102	Overall
	#49	Relational DBMS

Website

linter.ru/en

maxdb.sap.com

Technical documentation

maxdb.sap.com/documentation

Developer

relex.ru/en

SAP, acquired from Software AG (Adabas-D) in 1997

Initial release

1990

1984

Current release

7.9.10 (January 2020), 2020

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Limited community edition free

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C and C++

C++

Server operating systems

AIX
Android
BSD
HP Open VMS
iOS
Linux
OS X
VxWorks
Windows

AIX
HP-UX
Linux
Solaris
Windows

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
JDBC
LINQ
ODBC
OLE DB
Oracle Call Interface (OCI)

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
WebDAV

Supported programming languages

C
C#
C++
Java
Perl
PHP
Python
Qt
Ruby
Tcl

.Net
C#
Java
Perl
PHP
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

proprietary syntax with the possibility to convert from PL/SQL

yes

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Dear SAP, Why Don't You Make Hana A Success?
28 July 2021, e3zine.com

5 Top Data Recovery Trends
25 September 2022, Enterprise Storage Forum

Remotely Exploitable Vulnerabilities in SAP Compression Algorithms
13 May 2015, Threatpost

What is SAP S/4HANA?
21 March 2022, TechTarget

SAP Business ByDesign and the journey to HANA
15 December 2014, Diginomica

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

SAP Solution Manager
Capgemini, New York, NY

SAP BASIS & HANA Expert
Corteva Agriscience, Des Moines, IA

SAP BASIS & HANA Expert
Corteva, Des Moines, IA

SAP BASIS & HANA Expert
Corteva, Wilmington, DE

SAP BASIS & HANA Expert
Corteva, Indianapolis, IN

jobs by

Share this page