DBMS > LeanXcale vs. SQLite

System Properties Comparison LeanXcale vs. SQLite

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare LeanXcale and SQLite with CockroachDB, Snowflake and Elasticsearch.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A highly scalable full ACID SQL database with fast NoSQL data ingestion and GIS capabilities

Widely used embeddable, in-process RDBMS

Primary database model

Key-value store
Relational DBMS

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.26
Rank	#266	Overall
	#40	Key-value stores
	#124	Relational DBMS

Score	123.17
Rank	#9	Overall
	#6	Relational DBMS

Website

www.leanxcale.com

www.sqlite.org

Technical documentation

www.sqlite.org/docs.html

Developer

LeanXcale

Dwayne Richard Hipp

Initial release

2015

2000

Current release

3.34.1, January 2021

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Public Domain

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Server operating systems

server-less

Data scheme

yes

dynamic column types

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

not rigid because of 'dynamic typing' concept.

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

through Apache Derby

yes

SQL-92 is not fully supported

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
Kafka Connector
ODBC
proprietary key/value interface
Spark Connector

ADO.NET

inofficial driver
JDBC

inofficial driver
ODBC

inofficial driver

Supported programming languages

C
Java
Scala

Actionscript
Ada
Basic
C
C#
C++
D
Delphi
Forth
Fortran
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
Lisp
Lua
MatLab
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
PL/SQL
Python
R
Ruby
Scala
Scheme
Smalltalk
Tcl

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

via file-system locks

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

More information provided by the system vendor

Specific characteristics

Full ACID and full SQL operational database with analytical queries over operational...
» more

Competitive advantages

Linear scalability upto 100s of nodes (tested with 100 nodes and TPC-C).
» more

Typical application scenarios

Hybrid Transactional-Analytical Processing (HTAP) requiring an operational database...
» more

Key customers

banking/finance/fintech, telco, insurance, traveltech, M2M/IoT, retail
» more

Market metrics

15 beta testers
» more

Licensing and pricing models

annual fee covering license and support based on number of physical cores
» more

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.