DBMS > LeanXcale vs. OrigoDB

System Properties Comparison LeanXcale vs. OrigoDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare LeanXcale and OrigoDB with Microsoft SQL Server, JaguarDB and Alibaba Cloud MaxCompute.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A highly scalable full ACID SQL database with fast NoSQL data ingestion and GIS capabilities

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

Primary database model

Key-value store
Relational DBMS

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.17
Rank	#297	Overall
	#43	Key-value stores
	#138	Relational DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#363	Overall
	#49	Document stores
	#20	Object oriented DBMS

Website

www.leanxcale.com

origodb.com

Technical documentation

origodb.com/docs

Developer

LeanXcale

Robert Friberg et al

Initial release

2015

2009

under the name LiveDB

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

User defined using .NET types and collections

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

can be achieved using .NET

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

through Apache Derby

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
Kafka Connector
ODBC
proprietary key/value interface
Spark Connector

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

Supported programming languages

C
Java
Scala

.Net

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes

Domain Events

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

depending on model

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Write ahead log

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Role based authorization

More information provided by the system vendor

Specific characteristics

Full ACID and full SQL operational database with analytical queries over operational...
» more

Competitive advantages

Linear scalability upto 100s of nodes (tested with 100 nodes and TPC-C).
» more

Typical application scenarios

Hybrid Transactional-Analytical Processing (HTAP) requiring an operational database...
» more

Key customers

banking/finance/fintech, telco, insurance, traveltech, M2M/IoT, retail
» more

Market metrics

15 beta testers
» more

Licensing and pricing models

annual fee covering license and support based on number of physical cores
» more

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

Share this page