DBMS > LMDB vs. XTDB

System Properties Comparison LMDB vs. XTDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare LMDB and XTDB with RocksDB, Amazon DynamoDB and PostgreSQL.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A high performant, light-weight, embedded key-value database library

A general purpose database with bitemporal SQL and Datalog and graph queries

Primary database model

Key-value store

Document store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.75
Rank	#127	Overall
	#20	Key-value stores

Score	0.20
Rank	#307	Overall
	#46	Document stores

Website

www.symas.com/symas-embedded-database-lmdb

github.com/xtdb/xtdb
www.xtdb.com

Technical documentation

www.lmdb.tech/doc

www.xtdb.com/docs

Developer

Symas

Juxt Ltd.

Initial release

2011

2019

Current release

0.9.32, January 2024

1.19, September 2021

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

MIT License

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Clojure

Server operating systems

Linux
Unix
Windows

All OS with a Java 8 (and higher) VM
Linux

Data scheme

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes, extensible-data-notation format

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

limited SQL, making use of Apache Calcite

APIs and other access methods

HTTP REST
JDBC

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C++
Clojure
Go
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Lisp
Lua
MatLab
Nim
Objective C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Rust
Swift
Tcl

Clojure
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

none

yes, each node contains all data

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

yes, flexibel persistency by using storage technologies like Apache Kafka, RocksDB or LMDB

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Pandas Can’t Handle This: How ArcticDB Powers Massive Datasets
12 February 2025, Towards Data Science

The Lightning Memory-mapped Database
2 March 2016, infoq.com

Threat Actors Exploit Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Connect Secure and Policy Secure Gateways
29 February 2024, CISA (.gov)

Akamai launches managed database service
25 April 2022, Blocks and Files

Introducing Quicksilver: Configuration Distribution at Internet Scale
30 March 2020, The Cloudflare Blog

provided by Google News

Share this page