DBMS > JaguarDB vs. SQLite vs. YugabyteDB

System Properties Comparison JaguarDB vs. SQLite vs. YugabyteDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Performant, highly scalable DBMS for AI and IoT applications

Widely used embeddable, in-process RDBMS

High-performance distributed SQL database for global, internet-scale applications. Wire and feature compatible with PostgreSQL.

Primary database model

Key-value store
Vector DBMS

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store
Wide column store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.03
Rank	#365	Overall
	#55	Key-value stores
	#17	Vector DBMS

Score	101.72
Rank	#10	Overall
	#7	Relational DBMS

Score	2.45
Rank	#107	Overall
	#53	Relational DBMS

Website

www.jaguardb.com

www.sqlite.org

www.yugabyte.com

Technical documentation

www.jaguardb.com/support.html

www.sqlite.org/docs.html

docs.yugabyte.com
github.com/yugabyte/yugabyte-db

Developer

DataJaguar, Inc.

Dwayne Richard Hipp

Yugabyte Inc.

Initial release

2015

2000

2017

Current release

3.3 July 2023

3.46.1 (13 August 2024), August 2024

2.19, September 2023

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

GPL V3.0

Open Source

Public Domain

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

the server part. Clients available in other languages

C and C++

Server operating systems

Linux

server-less

Linux
OS X

Data scheme

yes

dynamic column types

depending on used data model

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

not rigid because of 'dynamic typing' concept.

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

A subset of ANSI SQL is implemented

but no views, foreign keys, triggers

yes

SQL-92 is not fully supported

yes, PostgreSQL compatible

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
ODBC

ADO.NET

inofficial driver
JDBC

inofficial driver
ODBC

inofficial driver

JDBC
YCQL, an SQL-based flexible-schema API with its roots in Cassandra Query Language
YSQL - a fully relational SQL API that is wire compatible with the SQL language in PostgreSQL

Supported programming languages

C
C++
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scala

Actionscript
Ada
Basic
C
C#
C++
D
Delphi
Forth
Fortran
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
Lisp
Lua
MatLab
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
PL/SQL
Python
R
Ruby
Scala
Scheme
Smalltalk
Tcl

C
C#
C++
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust
Scala

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

sql, plpgsql, C

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

none

Hash and Range Sharding, row-level geo-partitioning

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Multi-source replication

none

Based on Raft distributed consensus protocol, minimum 3 replicas for continuous availability

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency

Strong consistency on writes and tunable consistency on reads

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Distributed ACID with Serializable & Snapshot Isolation. Inspired by Google Spanner architecture.

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

via file-system locks

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

based on RocksDB

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

rights management via user accounts

yes

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Big gains for Relational Database Management Systems in DB-Engines Ranking
2 February 2016, Matthias Gelbmann

show all

Recent citations in the news

SQLite re-implemented in Rust to achieve asynchronous I/O and other changes
12 December 2024, DevClass

Zero-latency SQLite storage in every Durable Object
26 September 2024, The Cloudflare Blog

How to install SQLite on Windows
20 October 2024, TheServerSide.com

Optimize Your SQLite Database with the Laravel Optimize DB Package
6 October 2024, Laravel News

Google uses large language model to discover real-world vulnerability
3 November 2024, The Record from Recorded Future News

provided by Google News

Yugabyte Announces Sixth Annual Distributed SQL Summit, Unveils Keynote and Lineup of Speakers for November Hybrid Event
3 October 2024, Business Wire

YugabyteDB evolves into a distributed PostgreSQL database for apps that need resilience and scale
19 September 2024, SiliconANGLE News

YugabyteDB Evolves PostgreSQL to a Distributed Architecture for Modern, Cloud-Native Applications
19 September 2024, Business Wire

YugabyteDB on AWS Graviton: The Winning Combination for Distributed SQL Developers
15 November 2024, AWS Blog

Simplifying cloud-native app development with Yugabyte
2 August 2024, IMDA

provided by Google News

Share this page