DBMS > JaguarDB vs. OpenMLDB vs. Tarantool

System Properties Comparison JaguarDB vs. OpenMLDB vs. Tarantool

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Performant, highly scalable DBMS for AI and IoT applications

An open-source machine learning database that provides a feature platform for training and inference

In-memory computing platform with a flexible data schema for efficiently building high-performance applications

Primary database model

Key-value store
Vector DBMS

Time Series DBMS

Document store
Key-value store
Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Relational DBMS

Spatial DBMS

with Tarantool/GIS extension

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.00
Rank	#381	Overall
	#61	Key-value stores
	#19	Vector DBMS

Score	0.02
Rank	#368	Overall
	#38	Time Series DBMS

Score	1.33
Rank	#155	Overall
	#26	Document stores
	#25	Key-value stores
	#68	Relational DBMS

Website

www.jaguardb.com

openmldb.ai

www.tarantool.io

Technical documentation

www.jaguardb.com/support.html

openmldb.ai/docs/zh/main

www.tarantool.io/en/doc

Developer

DataJaguar, Inc.

4 Paradigm Inc.

Initial release

2015

2020

2008

Current release

3.3 July 2023

2024-2 February 2024

2.10.0, May 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

GPL V3.0

Open Source

BSD-2, source-available extensions (modules), commercial licenses for Tarantool Enterprise

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

the server part. Clients available in other languages

C++, Java, Scala

C and C++

Server operating systems

Linux

BSD
Linux
macOS

Data scheme

yes

Fixed schema

Flexible data schema: relational definition for tables with ability to store json-like documents in columns

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

string, double, decimal, uuid, integer, blob, boolean, datetime

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

A subset of ANSI SQL is implemented

but no views, foreign keys, triggers

yes

Full-featured ANSI SQL support

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
ODBC

JDBC
SQLAlchemy

Open binary protocol

Supported programming languages

C
C++
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scala

C++
Go
Java
Python
Scala

C
C#
C++
Erlang
Go
Java
JavaScript
Lua
Perl
PHP
Python
Rust

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Lua, C and SQL stored procedures

Triggers

yes, before/after data modification events, on replication events, client session events

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

horizontal partitioning

Sharding, partitioned with virtual buckets by user defined affinity key. Live resharding for scale up and scale down without maintenance downtime.

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Multi-source replication

Source-replica replication

Asynchronous replication with multi-master option
Configurable replication topology (full-mesh, chain, star)
Synchronous quorum replication (with Raft)

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency

Immediate Consistency

Casual consistency across sharding partitions
Eventual consistency within replicaset partition

when using asyncronous replication
Immediate Consistency within single instance
Sequential consistency including linearizable read within replicaset partition

when using Raft

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID, with serializable isolation and linearizable read (within partition); Configurable MVCC (within partition); No cross-shard distributed transactions

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

yes, cooperative multitasking

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

yes, write ahead logging

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

yes, full featured in-memory storage engine with persistence

User concepts

Access control

rights management via user accounts

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Access Control Lists
Mutual TLS authentication for Tarantol Enterprise
Password based authentication
Role-based access control (RBAC) and LDAP for Tarantol Enterprise
Users and Roles

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Data processing speed and reliability: in-memory synchronous replication
9 November 2021, Vladimir Perepelytsya, Tarantool (sponsor)

show all

Recent citations in the news

MLOps Practice: Using OpenMLDB in the Real-Time Anti-Fraud Model for the Bank's Online Transaction
27 July 2021, Towards Data Science

Compared to Native Spark 3.0, We Have Achieved Significant Optimization Effects in the AI
4 August 2021, Towards Data Science

Predictive maintenance – 5minutes demo of an end to end machine learning project
13 August 2021, Towards Data Science

provided by Google News

Tarantool Announces New Enterprise Version With Enhanced Scaling and Monitoring Capabilities
18 May 2018, Newswire

Accelerating PHP connectors for Tarantool using Async, Swoole, and Parallel
18 December 2019, Хабр

VShard — horizontal scaling in Tarantool
7 March 2019, Хабр

provided by Google News

Share this page