DBMS > Infobright vs. QuestDB vs. Teradata

System Properties Comparison Infobright vs. QuestDB vs. Teradata

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

High performant column-oriented DBMS for analytic workloads using MySQL or PostgreSQL as a frontend

A high performance open source SQL database for time series data

A hybrid cloud data analytics software platform (Teradata Vantage)

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Time Series DBMS

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Relational DBMS

Document store
Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS
Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.81
Rank	#204	Overall
	#96	Relational DBMS

Score	3.00
Rank	#84	Overall
	#6	Time Series DBMS

Score	36.25
Rank	#22	Overall
	#15	Relational DBMS

Website

ignitetech.com/softwarelibrary/infobrightdb

questdb.io

www.teradata.com

Technical documentation

questdb.io/docs

docs.teradata.com

Developer

Ignite Technologies Inc.; formerly InfoBright Inc.

QuestDB Technology Inc

Teradata

Initial release

2005

2014

1984

Current release

Teradata Vantage 1.0 MU2, January 2019

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

The open source (GPLv2) version did not support inserts/updates/deletes and was discontinued with July 2016

Open Source

Apache 2.0

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java (Zero-GC), C++, Rust

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

Linux
macOS
Windows

hosted
Linux

Data scheme

yes

schema-free via InfluxDB Line Protocol

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

Knowledge Grid Technology used instead

yes

Join-index to prejoin tables, aggregate index, sparse index, hash index

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

SQL with time-series extensions

yes

SQL 2016 + extensions

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC

HTTP REST
InfluxDB Line Protocol (TCP/UDP)
JDBC
PostgreSQL wire protocol

.NET Client API
HTTP REST
JDBC
JMS Adapter
ODBC
OLE DB

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C#
C++
D
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

PostgreSQL driver
C++
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python
Rust

over HTTP

C
C++
Cobol
Java (JDBC-ODBC)
Perl
PL/1
Python
R
Ruby

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

UDFs, stored procedures, table functions in parallel

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

horizontal partitioning (by timestamps)

Sharding

Hashing

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

Source-replica replication with eventual consistency

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

ACID for single-table writes

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

through memory mapped files

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

exploiting MySQL or PostgreSQL frontend capabilities

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Teradata is the most popular data warehouse DBMS
2 April 2013, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

High Performance Time - Series Database Design with QuestDB
9 January 2025, InfoQ.com

Making a trading Gameboy: A pocket exchange and algo trading platform @QuestDb
12 November 2024, Adafruit Blog

'Trading Game Boy' is a small game console that can simulate stock trading.
12 November 2024, GIGAZINE（ギガジン）

SQL Extensions for Time-Series Data in QuestDB
11 January 2021, Towards Data Science

Build a Real-time Stock Price Dashboard With Python, QuestDB and Plotly
6 November 2021, hackernoon.com

provided by Google News

Assenagon Asset Management S.A. Raises Stake in Teradata Co. (NYSE:TDC)
18 January 2025, MarketBeat

SAP must face Teradata trade secrets and antitrust lawsuit, US court rules
19 December 2024, Reuters.com

Teradata’s Tightrope: Navigating Cloud Migration As Competitor Builds Its Warchest (TDC)
25 December 2024, Seeking Alpha

How Teradata improved system availability using Amazon EBS Multi-Attach NVMe reservations
19 July 2024, AWS Blog

2025-01-19 | Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Encourages Teradata Corporation (TDC) Shareholders to Inquire about Securities Investigation | NYSE:TDC | Press Release
19 January 2025, Stockhouse Publishing

provided by Google News

Share this page