DBMS > Infobright vs. Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics vs. Percona Server for MySQL

System Properties Comparison Infobright vs. Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics vs. Percona Server for MySQL

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

High performant column-oriented DBMS for analytic workloads using MySQL or PostgreSQL as a frontend

Elastic, large scale data warehouse service leveraging the broad eco-system of SQL Server

Enhanced drop-in replacement for MySQL based on XtraDB or TokuDB storage engines with improved performance and additional diagnostic and management features.

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.57
Rank	#182	Overall
	#88	Relational DBMS

Score	24.93
Rank	#32	Overall
	#19	Relational DBMS

Score	3.38
Rank	#108	Overall
	#53	Relational DBMS

Website

ignitetech.com/softwarelibrary/infobrightdb

azure.microsoft.com/services/synapse-analytics

www.percona.com/software/mysql-database/percona-server

Technical documentation

docs.microsoft.com/azure/synapse-analytics

www.percona.com/downloads/Percona-Server-LATEST

Developer

Ignite Technologies Inc.; formerly InfoBright Inc.

Microsoft

Percona

Initial release

2005

2016

2008

Current release

8.0.32-24, 2023

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

The open source (GPLv2) version did not support inserts/updates/deletes and was discontinued with July 2016

commercial

Open Source

GPL version 2

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

C and C++

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

hosted

Linux

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

Knowledge Grid Technology used instead

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C#
C++
D
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

C#
Java
PHP

Ada
C
C#
C++
D
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Transact SQL

yes

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Sharding, horizontal partitioning

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

yes

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication
XtraDB Cluster

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/synapse-analytics/sql-data-warehouse/sql-data-warehouse-table-constraints

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

exploiting MySQL or PostgreSQL frontend capabilities

yes

Users with fine-grained authorization concept

no user groups or roles

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Should I use the Infobright database or is there a better aggregation solution?
15 April 2017, dba.stackexchange.com

Infobright
3 January 2022, dbdb.io

Writing to Infobright Database
3 February 2010, cloverdx.com

Fig. 1. Loading and querying in Infobright database system. Data is...
7 September 2018, ResearchGate

Revision Infobright
22 April 2018, dbdb.io

provided by Google News

What is Azure Synapse Analytics?
15 May 2023, Experts Exchange

Introducing Microsoft Fabric: The data platform for the era of AI ...
23 May 2023, azure.microsoft.com

Cloud Data Warehouse Companies
9 May 2023, Datamation

Microsoft's data and analytics platform Fabric announces unified ...
31 May 2023, VentureBeat

Microsoft Build 2023: Bing AI and Copilot Plugins for ChatGPT ...
2 June 2023, InfoQ.com

provided by Google News

If you don't brush and floss, you're gonna get an abscess – same with MySQL updates
11 May 2023, The Register

Oracle Support for MySQL 5.7 Ends Soon, Key Upgrades in 8.0
30 May 2023, The New Stack

The Percona 2023 State of Open Source Database Survey Reveals ...
23 May 2023, Business Wire

Top 15 MongoDB Competitors and Alternatives
1 June 2023, Business Strategy Hub

MySQL Database Optimisation in Simple but Effective Way
11 May 2023, link.medium.com

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

Azure Data Factory Engineer
Insight Enterprises, Inc., United States

Azure Data Engineer
DHL eCommerce, Remote

DevOps Enigneer
Intone Networks, Remote

ETL Developer
Intone Networks, Remote

Azure Data Engineer
Booz Allen Hamilton, Melbourne, FL

Systems Administrator
Tyler Technologies, Little Rock, AR

Database Reliability Engineer
Viant, Los Angeles, CA

Database Reliability Engineer
Viant, Remote

Senior Database Administrator - MySQL
Datavail, United States

Manager of Site Reliability Engineering - Remote
Akamai, United States

jobs by

Share this page