DBMS > Infobright vs. Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs. Transbase

System Properties Comparison Infobright vs. Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs. Transbase

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

High performant column-oriented DBMS for analytic workloads using MySQL or PostgreSQL as a frontend

Database as a Service offering with high compatibility to Microsoft SQL Server

A resource-optimized, high-performance, universally applicable RDBMS

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store
Graph DBMS
Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.40
Rank	#178	Overall
	#85	Relational DBMS

Score	77.44
Rank	#16	Overall
	#10	Relational DBMS

Score	0.51
Rank	#274	Overall
	#126	Relational DBMS

Website

ignitetech.com/softwarelibrary/infobrightdb

azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/sql-database

www.transaction.de/en/products/transbase.html

Technical documentation

docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-sql

www.transaction.de/en/products/transbase/features.html

Developer

Ignite Technologies Inc.; formerly InfoBright Inc.

Microsoft

Transaction Software GmbH

Initial release

2005

2010

1987

Current release

V12

Transbase 8.3, 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

The open source (GPLv2) version did not support inserts/updates/deletes and was discontinued with July 2016

commercial

free development license

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

yes

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

C and C++

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

hosted

FreeBSD
Linux
macOS
Solaris
Windows

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

Knowledge Grid Technology used instead

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

APIs and other access methods

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
Proprietary native API

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C#
C++
D
Eiffel
Erlang
Haskell
Java
Objective-C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scheme
Tcl

.Net
C#
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
PHP
Python
Ruby

C
C#
C++
Java
JavaScript
Kotlin
Objective-C
PHP
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Transact SQL

yes

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Source-replica replication

yes, with always 3 replicas available

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

yes

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

exploiting MySQL or PostgreSQL frontend capabilities

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

PostgreSQL is the DBMS of the Year 2020
4 January 2021, Paul Andlinger, Matthias Gelbmann

Cloud-based DBMS's popularity grows at high rates
12 December 2019, Paul Andlinger

The popularity of cloud-based DBMSs has increased tenfold in four years
7 February 2017, Matthias Gelbmann

show all

Recent citations in the news

Should I use the Infobright database or is there a better aggregation solution?
4 April 2012, dba.stackexchange.com

Revision Infobright
22 April 2018, dbdb.io

Writing to Infobright Database
3 February 2010, cloverdx.com

Fig. 1. Loading and querying in Infobright database system. Data is...
7 September 2018, ResearchGate

Infobright/MySQL Statistics Utility
22 May 2012, codeproject.com

provided by Google News

How to Install SQL Server Management Studio on a Mac
28 October 2022, Built In

Discover and govern Azure SQL Database - Microsoft Purview
17 March 2023, Microsoft

Set up SQL Data Sync - Azure SQL Database
17 March 2023, Microsoft

Manage access to Azure SQL Database system health and performance using Microsoft Purview DevOps policies, a ...
17 March 2023, Microsoft

Back up and restore a database - Azure Data Studio
16 March 2023, Microsoft

provided by Google News

One City's Proposed E-Scooter Ultimatum: No Sidewalks or No ...
20 September 2022, Route Fifty

SF Mulls Strict New Rules to Keep Scooters Off Sidewalks
12 September 2022, The San Francisco Standard

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

AZURE SQL DATABASE ADMINISTRATOR
State of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

Azure Systems Administrator
Booz Allen Hamilton, Melbourne, FL

DevOps - Azure Cloud Engineer
Union Pacific, Louisville, CO

Azure Integration Engineer #23-00015
Abode Techzone LLC, Remote

Azure Cloud Engineer
Project Hosts, Remote

jobs by

Share this page