DBMS > IRONdb vs. TigerGraph
System Properties Comparison IRONdb vs. TigerGraph
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
Our visitors often compare IRONdb and TigerGraph with Redis.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||IRONdb Xexclude from comparison||TigerGraph Xexclude from comparison|
|IRONdb seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.|
|Description||A distributed Time Series DBMS with a focus on scalability, fault tolerance and operational simplicity||A complete, distributed, parallel graph computing platform supporting web-scale data analytics in real-time|
|Primary database model||Time Series DBMS||Graph DBMS|
|Current release||V0.10.20, January 2018|
|License Commercial or Open Source||commercial||commercial|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Implementation language||C and C++||C++|
|Server operating systems||Linux||Linux|
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||yes text, numeric, histograms||yes|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no||no|
|SQL Support of SQL||SQL-like query language (Circonus Analytics Query Language: CAQL)||SQL-like query language (GSQL)|
|APIs and other access methods||HTTP API||GSQL (TigerGraph Query Language)|
RESTful HTTP/JSON API
|Supported programming languages||.Net|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||yes, in Lua||yes|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||Automatic, metric affinity per node|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||configurable replication factor, datacenter aware|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no||yes|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Immediate consistency per node, eventual consistency across nodes|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||no||yes Relationships in graphs|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||no||ACID|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||no||no|
|User concepts Access control||no||Role-based access control|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|Recent citations in the news|
On the Radar: COVID-19, Circonus, and Fake FB Accounts
provided by Google News
TigerGraph Bolsters DB for Enterprise Graph Workloads
New TigerGraph CEO Refocuses Efforts on Enterprise Customers
Global Graph Technology Market Report 2023-2030 with ...
NoSQL Database Market Update – Emerging Segments to Drive ...
Aerospike takes on Neo4j and TigerGraph with launch of graph ...
provided by Google News
TigerGraph GSQL Developer
Senior Data Engineer, Unity Ads
Lead Software Engineer - Public Cloud Graph Platforms
Sr. Software Engineer, Infrastructure (Kubernetes)
Share this page