DBMS > Hypertable vs. XTDB

System Properties Comparison Hypertable vs. XTDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare Hypertable and XTDB with TimescaleDB, PostgreSQL and Vitess.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Hypertable has stopped its further development with March 2016 and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

An open source BigTable implementation based on distributed file systems such as Hadoop

A general purpose database with bitemporal SQL and Datalog and graph queries

Primary database model

Wide column store

Document store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.20
Rank	#314	Overall
	#46	Document stores

Website

github.com/xtdb/xtdb
www.xtdb.com

Technical documentation

www.xtdb.com/docs

Developer

Hypertable Inc.

Juxt Ltd.

Initial release

2009

2019

Current release

0.9.8.11, March 2016

1.19, September 2021

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

GNU version 3. Commercial license available

Open Source

MIT License

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

Clojure

Server operating systems

Linux
OS X
Windows

an inofficial Windows port is available

All OS with a Java 8 (and higher) VM
Linux

Data scheme

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes, extensible-data-notation format

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

restricted

only exact value or prefix value scans

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

limited SQL, making use of Apache Calcite

APIs and other access methods

C++ API
Thrift

HTTP REST
JDBC

Supported programming languages

C++
Java
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby

Clojure
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

selectable replication factor on file system level

yes, each node contains all data

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

yes, flexibel persistency by using storage technologies like Apache Kafka, RocksDB or LMDB

User concepts

Access control

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Hyperdesk Archives
2 May 2025, Finovate

Speed up time series data ingestion by partitioning tables on Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL | Amazon Web Services
18 August 2021, Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Power IoT and time-series workloads with TimescaleDB for Azure Database for PostgreSQL
18 March 2019, Microsoft Azure

The Collective: Customize Your Computer & Your Phone With Star Trek
18 March 2009, TrekMovie.com

Groupon Acquires Naveen Co-Founded Campfire Labs
9 November 2020, Siliconindia

provided by Google News

Share this page