DBMS > Hypertable vs. OpenEdge
System Properties Comparison Hypertable vs. OpenEdge
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Hypertable Xexclude from comparison||OpenEdge Xexclude from comparison|
|Hypertable has stopped its further development with March 2016 and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking.|
|Description||An open source BigTable implementation based on distributed file systems such as Hadoop||Application development environment with integrated database management system|
|Primary database model||Wide column store||Relational DBMS|
|Developer||Hypertable Inc.||Progress Software Corporation|
|Current release||0.9.8.11, March 2016||OpenEdge 12.2, March 2020|
|License Commercial or Open Source||Open Source GNU version 3. Commercial license available||commercial|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Server operating systems||Linux|
Windows an inofficial Windows port is available
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||no||yes|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||yes|
|Secondary indexes||restricted only exact value or prefix value scans||yes|
|SQL Support of SQL||no||yes close to SQL 92|
|APIs and other access methods||C++ API|
|Supported programming languages||C++|
|Progress proprietary ABL (Advanced Business Language)|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||no||yes|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||Sharding||horizontal partitioning since Version 11.4|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||selectable replication factor on file system level||Source-replica replication|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||yes||no|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Immediate Consistency||Immediate Consistency|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||no||yes|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||no||ACID|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||no|
|User concepts Access control||no||Users and groups|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|Recent citations in the news|
NoSQL Database Market Growth and Key Dynamics 2023 ...
Why We Built Cloud Native Object Storage for PostgreSQL with ...
TimescaleDB goes distributed; implements ‘Chunking’ over ‘Sharding’ for scaling-out
NoSQL Basics: Features, Types, and Examples
NoSQL Market Size, Industry Share, Leading Players, Growth and ...
provided by Google News
SQL Vs. NoSQL Vs. NewSQL: Finding The Right Solution
provided by Google News
Progress OpenEdge Database Administrator
Share this page