DBMS > Hypertable vs. Microsoft Access vs. SiteWhere

System Properties Comparison Hypertable vs. Microsoft Access vs. SiteWhere

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Hypertable has stopped its further development with March 2016 and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

An open source BigTable implementation based on distributed file systems such as Hadoop

Microsoft Access combines a backend RDBMS (JET / ACE Engine) with a GUI frontend for data manipulation and queries.

The Access frontend is often used for accessing other datasources (DBMS, Excel, etc.)

M2M integration platform for persisting/querying time series data

Primary database model

Wide column store

Relational DBMS

Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	143.44
Rank	#9	Overall
	#6	Relational DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#354	Overall
	#33	Time Series DBMS

Website

www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/access

sitewhere.io

Technical documentation

developer.microsoft.com/en-us/access

sitewhere.io/docs/2.1.0

Developer

Hypertable Inc.

Microsoft

SiteWhere

Initial release

2009

1992

2010

Current release

0.9.8.11, March 2016

1902 (16.0.11328.20222), March 2019

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

GNU version 3. Commercial license available

commercial

Bundled with Microsoft Office

Open Source

Common Public Attribution License Version 1.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

Java

Server operating systems

Linux
OS X
Windows

an inofficial Windows port is available

Windows

Not a real database server, but making use of DLLs

Linux
OS X
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

yes

predefined scheme

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

restricted

only exact value or prefix value scans

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

but not compliant to any SQL standard

APIs and other access methods

C++ API
Thrift

ADO.NET
DAO
ODBC
OLE DB

HTTP REST

Supported programming languages

C++
Java
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby

C
C#
C++
Delphi
Java (JDBC-ODBC)
VBA
Visual Basic.NET

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

since Access 2010 using the ACE-engine

Triggers

yes

since Access 2010 using the ACE-engine

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

none

Sharding

based on HBase

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

selectable replication factor on file system level

none

selectable replication factor

based on HBase

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

but no files for transaction logging

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

but no files for transaction logging

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

User concepts

Access control

a simple user-level security was built in till version Access 2003

Users with fine-grained authorization concept

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

MS Access drops in DB-Engines Ranking
2 May 2013, Paul Andlinger

Microsoft SQL Server regained rank 2 in the DB-Engines popularity ranking
3 December 2012, Matthias Gelbmann

New DB-Engines Ranking shows the popularity of database management systems
3 October 2012, Matthias Gelbmann, Paul Andlinger

show all

Recent citations in the news

TimescaleDB goes distributed; implements ‘Chunking’ over ‘Sharding’ for scaling-out
22 August 2019, Packt Hub

NoSQL Databases | When to Use NoSQL vs SQL
19 January 2022, Server Watch

provided by Google News

Antrow Is Helping To Save Time and Effort By Easily Converting MS-Access applications to An Online Web App
11 May 2022, Digital Journal

The 12 Best Features of Microsoft Access for Database Management - MUO
9 December 2021, MakeUseOf

Working with external text files in MS Access
18 December 2009, Database Journal

Uses for Cartesian Products in MS Access
18 September 2009, Database Journal

Use Access 2007 to Get Started in Data Mining
12 January 2009, Database Journal

provided by Google News

IoT Device Management Market Size Worth $5830.72 Mn, Globally, by 2028 at 28.50% CAGR, (Strategic Investment Plans | Business Opportunities | SWOT Analysis): Exclusive Report by Zion Market Research
2 May 2022, PR Newswire

9 Best & Top Open source IoT Platforms To Develop the IOT Projects
13 April 2019, H2S Media

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

Data Entry Operator (Seasonal)
HealthAxis Group, United States

STEPS Part Time Interviewer
University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY

Administrative Assistant
Casepoint, Remote

Document Control Supervisor
Michael Baker International, Midvale, UT

Claims Filing Analyst (Remote)
Flagstar Bank, Remote

jobs by

Share this page