DBMS > Hypertable vs. Kinetica

System Properties Comparison Hypertable vs. Kinetica

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare Hypertable and Kinetica with MongoDB, PostgreSQL and MySQL.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Hypertable has stopped its further development with March 2016 and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

An open source BigTable implementation based on distributed file systems such as Hadoop

GPU-accelerated database for real-time analysis of large and streaming datasets

Primary database model

Wide column store

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.77
Rank	#192	Overall
	#96	Relational DBMS

Website

www.kinetica.com

Technical documentation

www.kinetica.com/docs

Developer

Hypertable Inc.

Kinetica

Initial release

2009

2012

Current release

0.9.8.11, March 2016

6.0

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

GNU version 3. Commercial license available

commercial

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

C, C++

Server operating systems

Linux
OS X
Windows

an inofficial Windows port is available

Linux

Data scheme

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

restricted

only exact value or prefix value scans

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like DML and DDL statements

APIs and other access methods

C++ API
Thrift

JDBC
ODBC
RESTful HTTP API

Supported programming languages

C++
Java
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby

C++
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

Triggers

yes

triggers when inserted values for one or more columns fall within a specified range

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

selectable replication factor on file system level

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency depending on configuration

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

GPU vRAM or System RAM

User concepts

Access control

Access rights for users and roles on table level

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

NoSQL Databases Market 2021: Regional Insights, Trends & Growth Forecast To 2026 – The Courier
12 March 2021, The Courier

NoSQL Databases Market to Witness Astonishing Growth With Vital Key Players | Accumulo, Aerospike, AmazonSimpleDB, AzureTable, Cassandra – The Courier
15 March 2021, The Courier

Impact of Covid-19 on NoSQL Databases Market Comprehensive Analysis, Growth Forecast from 2021 to 2025 | Accumulo, Aerospike, Amazon SimpleDB, etc – The Courier
22 March 2021, The Courier

Nosql Market Rapidly Growing With Key Trends, Future Analysis and Forecast by 2021-2026 – SoccerNurds
20 March 2021, SoccerNurds

Global NoSQL Market 2025: Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, MongoDB, PostgreSQL, Oracle Database, MongoLab, MarkLogic, Couchbase, CloudDB, DynamoDB, Basho Technologies, Aerospike, IBM, Neo, Hypertable, Cisco, Objectivity
5 April 2021, Jumbo News

provided by Google News

Global GPU Database Market Analysis By Growth and Forecast 2025: Kinetica, Omnisci, Sqream, Neo4j, Nvidia, Brytlyt, Jedox, Blazegraph, Blazingdb, Zilliz, Heterodb, H2o.Ai, Fastdata.Io, Fuzzy Logix, Graphistry, Anaconda etc. – SoccerNurds
10 April 2021, SoccerNurds

GPU Database Market 2021 Is Rapidly Increasing Worldwide in Near Future | Top Companies Analysis- Kinetica, Omnisci, Sqream, Neo4j, Nvidia, etc. – SoccerNurds
9 April 2021, SoccerNurds

GPU Database Market- increasing demand with Industry Professionals: Kinetica, Omnisci, Sqream, Neo4j, Nvidia etc. – The Bisouv Network
7 April 2021, The Bisouv Network

GPU Database Market Analysis, Geographical Segmentation, Drivers, Challenges, Trends and Forecast| Kinetica, OmniSci, SQream, Neo4j, NVIDIA, Brytlyt, Blazegraph, BlazingDB, Zilliz, and Jedox. Moreover, the other prospective players in the GPU database market are HeteroDB, H2O.ai, FASTDATA.io, Fuzzy Logix, and Anaconda.
7 April 2021, SoccerNurds

GPU Database Market : Kinetica, Omnisci, Sqream, Neo4j, Nvidia, Brytlyt, Jedox, Blazegraph, Blazingdb, Zilliz, Heterodb, H2o.Ai, Fastdata.Io, Fuzzy Logix, Graphistry, Anaconda etc.
6 April 2021, The Bisouv Network

provided by Google News

Share this page