DBMS > Hypertable vs. Ingres
System Properties Comparison Hypertable vs. Ingres
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Hypertable Xexclude from comparison||Ingres Xexclude from comparison|
|Hypertable has stopped its further development with March 2016 and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking.|
|Description||An open source BigTable implementation based on distributed file systems such as Hadoop||Well established RDBMS|
|Primary database model||Wide column store||Relational DBMS|
|Developer||Hypertable Inc.||Actian Corporation|
|Initial release||2009||1974 originally developed at University Berkely in early 1970s|
|Current release||0.9.8.11, March 2016||11.2, May 2022|
|License Commercial or Open Source||Open Source GNU version 3. Commercial license available||commercial|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Server operating systems||Linux|
Windows an inofficial Windows port is available
HP Open VMS
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||no||yes|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no but tools for importing/exporting data from/to XML-files available|
|Secondary indexes||restricted only exact value or prefix value scans||yes|
|SQL Support of SQL||no||yes|
|APIs and other access methods||C++ API|
|.NET Client API|
proprietary protocol (OpenAPI)
|Supported programming languages||C++|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||no||yes|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||Sharding||horizontal partitioning Ingres Star to access multiple databases simultaneously|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||selectable replication factor on file system level||Ingres Replicator|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||yes||no|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Immediate Consistency||Immediate Consistency|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||no||yes|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||no||ACID|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes MVCC|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||no|
|User concepts Access control||no||fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|Recent citations in the news|
Why We Built Cloud Native Object Storage for PostgreSQL with ...
Comparing Different Time-Series Databases
Senior design experience leads grad to be named 'rockstar' engineer
DataView VR: The Workspace of the Future
Timescale Launches Industry's First Multi-Node Relational Database ...
provided by Google News
Actian Launches Ingres as a Fully-Managed Cloud Service
PostgreSQL now top developer choice ahead of MySQL, according ...
Neon lands $46M for its serverless Postgres database management ...
Actian’s plan for the AI era
A Brief DevOps History: Databases to Infinity and Beyond, Part 2
provided by Google News
Software Engineer (NASA NEN)
System Administrator - Master
Share this page