DBMS > Hypertable vs. Infobright vs. SwayDB
System Properties Comparison Hypertable vs. Infobright vs. SwayDB
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Hypertable Xexclude from comparison||Infobright Xexclude from comparison||SwayDB Xexclude from comparison|
|Hypertable has stopped its further development with March 2016 and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking.|
|Description||An open source BigTable implementation based on distributed file systems such as Hadoop||High performant column-oriented DBMS for analytic workloads using MySQL or PostgreSQL as a frontend||An embeddable, non-blocking, type-safe key-value store for single or multiple disks and in-memory storage|
|Primary database model||Wide column store||Relational DBMS||Key-value store|
|Developer||Hypertable Inc.||Ignite Technologies Inc.; formerly InfoBright Inc.||Simer Plaha|
|Current release||0.9.8.11, March 2016|
|License Commercial or Open Source||Open Source GNU version 3. Commercial license available||commercial The open source (GPLv2) version did not support inserts/updates/deletes and was discontinued with July 2016||Open Source GNU Affero GPL V3.0|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Server operating systems||Linux|
Windows an inofficial Windows port is available
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||no||yes||no|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no||no|
|Secondary indexes||restricted only exact value or prefix value scans||no Knowledge Grid Technology used instead||no|
|SQL Support of SQL||no||yes||no|
|APIs and other access methods||C++ API|
|Supported programming languages||C++|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||no||no||no|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||Sharding||none||none|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||selectable replication factor on file system level||Source-replica replication||none|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||yes||no||no|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Immediate Consistency||Immediate Consistency||Immediate Consistency|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||no||no||no|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||no||ACID||Atomic execution of operations|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||yes||yes|
|User concepts Access control||no||fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard exploiting MySQL or PostgreSQL frontend capabilities||no|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|Recent citations in the news|
Why We Built Cloud Native Object Storage for PostgreSQL with ...
Comparing Different Time-Series Databases
Senior design experience leads grad to be named 'rockstar' engineer
High Volume Space Exploration Time-Series Data Storage in ...
Timescale Launches Industry's First Multi-Node Relational Database ...
provided by Google News
Share this page