DBMS > HyperSQL vs. Hypertable
System Properties Comparison HyperSQL vs. Hypertable
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
Our visitors often compare HyperSQL and Hypertable with PostgreSQL, MySQL and MongoDB.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||HyperSQL also known as HSQLDB Xexclude from comparison||Hypertable Xexclude from comparison|
|Hypertable has stopped its further development with March 2016 and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking.|
|Description||Multithreaded, transactional RDBMS written in Java also known as HSQLDB||An open source BigTable implementation based on distributed file systems such as Hadoop|
|Primary database model||Relational DBMS||Wide column store|
|Current release||2.7.1, October 2022||0.9.8.11, March 2016|
|License Commercial or Open Source||Open Source based on BSD license||Open Source GNU version 3. Commercial license available|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Server operating systems||All OS with a Java VM Embedded (into Java applications) and Client-Server operating modes||Linux|
Windows an inofficial Windows port is available
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||yes||no|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no|
|Secondary indexes||yes||restricted only exact value or prefix value scans|
|SQL Support of SQL||yes||no|
|APIs and other access methods||HTTP API JDBC via HTTP|
|Supported programming languages||All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||Java, SQL||no|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||none||Sharding|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||none||selectable replication factor on file system level|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no||yes|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Immediate Consistency||Immediate Consistency|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||yes||no|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||ACID||no|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||yes|
|User concepts Access control||fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard||no|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|HyperSQL also known as HSQLDB||Hypertable|
|Recent citations in the news|
HyperSQL DataBase flaw leaves library vulnerable to RCE
Introduction to JDBC with HSQLDB tutorial
SQLite patches 22-year-old code execution, denial of service vulnerability
Upcoming ‘critical’ OpenSSL update prompts feverish speculation
Open-source DBMS becoming battleground of public cloud
provided by Google News
NoSQL Database Market 2023 to See Huge Growth by 2029 ...
TimescaleDB goes distributed; implements ‘Chunking’ over ‘Sharding’ for scaling-out
Why We Built Cloud Native Object Storage for PostgreSQL with ...
NoSQL Market: A well-defined technological growth map with an ...
Timescale Announces TimescaleDB 1.0—Empowering ...
provided by Google News
Business Support Specialist
Share this page