DBMS > HugeGraph vs. OpenQM vs. OrigoDB vs. VelocityDB vs. Warp 10

System Properties Comparison HugeGraph vs. OpenQM vs. OrigoDB vs. VelocityDB vs. Warp 10

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A fast-speed and highly-scalable Graph DBMS

QpenQM is a high-performance, self-tuning, multi-value DBMS

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

A .NET Object Database that can be embedded/distributed and extended to a graph data model (VelocityGraph)

TimeSeries DBMS specialized on timestamped geo data based on LevelDB or HBase

Primary database model

Graph DBMS

Multivalue DBMS

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

Graph DBMS
Object oriented DBMS

Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.15
Rank	#339	Overall
	#33	Graph DBMS

Score	0.33
Rank	#286	Overall
	#10	Multivalue DBMS

Score	0.03
Rank	#378	Overall
	#51	Document stores
	#18	Object oriented DBMS

Score	0.11
Rank	#347	Overall
	#35	Graph DBMS
	#15	Object oriented DBMS

Score	0.08
Rank	#358	Overall
	#35	Time Series DBMS

Website

github.com/hugegraph
hugegraph.apache.org

www.rocketsoftware.com/products/rocket-multivalue-application-development-platform/rocket-open-qm

origodb.com

velocitydb.com

www.warp10.io

Technical documentation

hugegraph.apache.org/docs

origodb.com/docs

velocitydb.com/UserGuide

www.warp10.io/content/02_Getting_started

Developer

Baidu

Rocket Software, originally Martin Phillips

Robert Friberg et al

VelocityDB Inc

SenX

Initial release

2018

1993

2009

under the name LiveDB

2011

2015

Current release

0.9

3.4-12

7.x

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

Open Source

GPLv2, extended commercial license available

Open Source

commercial

Open Source

Apache License 2.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

Linux
macOS
Unix

AIX
FreeBSD
Linux
macOS
Raspberry Pi
Solaris
Windows

Linux
Windows

Any that supports .NET

Linux
OS X
Windows

Data scheme

yes

with some exceptions

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

User defined using .NET types and collections

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

can be achieved using .NET

Secondary indexes

yes

also supports composite index and range index

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

APIs and other access methods

Java API
RESTful HTTP API
TinkerPop Gremlin

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

.Net

HTTP API
Jupyter
WebSocket

Supported programming languages

Groovy
Java
Python

.Net
Basic
C
Java
Objective C
PHP
Python

.Net

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

asynchronous Gremlin script jobs

yes

WarpScript

Triggers

yes

Domain Events

Callbacks are triggered when data changes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

yes

depending on used storage backend, e.g. Cassandra and HBase

yes

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

Sharding

based on HBase

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

depending on used storage backend, e.g. Cassandra and HBase

yes

Source-replica replication

selectable replication factor

based on HBase

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

via hugegraph-spark

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency

Immediate Consistency

based on HBase

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

edges in graph

depending on model

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

Write ahead log

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Users, roles and permissions

Access rights can be defined down to the item level

Role based authorization

Based on Windows Authentication

Mandatory use of cryptographic tokens, containing fine-grained authorizations

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Critical Apache HugeGraph Flaw Let Attackers Execute Remote Code
23 April 2024, GBHackers

全面升级！Apache HugeGraph 1.2.0版本发布_apach hugegraph
27 February 2024, CSDN

HugeGraph 部署和Hubble1.0.0的数据导入Bug修复_hugegraph-hubble导入数据时选择属性显示不全
18 October 2023, CSDN

provided by Google News

Star Trek: 5 Things Picard Does Better Than Discovery (& 5 Things Discovery Does Better)
4 April 2020, Screen Rant

Launched Just A Year Ago, Open-Source Scality S3 Server Gains Extraordinary Momentum As It Simplifies The Life Of ...
28 June 2017, PR Newswire UK

Time Series Intelligence Software Market Business Insights, Key Trend Analysis | Google, SAP, Azure Time Series ...
24 April 2024, Amoré

provided by Google News

Share this page