DBMS > HugeGraph vs. HyperSQL

System Properties Comparison HugeGraph vs. HyperSQL

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare HugeGraph and HyperSQL with Microsoft SQL Server, Amazon Neptune and JaguarDB.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

A fast-speed and highly-scalable Graph DBMS

Multithreaded, transactional RDBMS written in Java

also known as HSQLDB

Primary database model

Graph DBMS

Relational DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.20
Rank	#288	Overall
	#22	Graph DBMS

Score	5.46
Rank	#76	Overall
	#41	Relational DBMS

Website

github.com/hugegraph

hsqldb.org

Technical documentation

hugegraph.github.io/hugegraph-doc

hsqldb.org/web/hsqlDocsFrame.html

Developer

Baidu

Initial release

2018

2001

Current release

0.9

2.6.1, October 2021

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

Open Source

based on BSD license

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

Linux
macOS
Unix

All OS with a Java VM

Embedded (into Java applications) and Client-Server operating modes

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

also supports composite index and range index

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

APIs and other access methods

Java API
RESTful HTTP API
TinkerPop Gremlin

HTTP API

JDBC via HTTP
JDBC
ODBC

Supported programming languages

Groovy
Java
Python

All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC
Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

asynchronous Gremlin script jobs

Java, SQL

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

yes

depending on used storage backend, e.g. Cassandra and HBase

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

depending on used storage backend, e.g. Cassandra and HBase

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

via hugegraph-spark

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

edges in graph

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Users, roles and permissions

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Java News Roundup: Classfile API Draft, Spring Boot, GlassFish, Project Reactor, Micronaut
27 June 2022, InfoQ.com

In-Memory Database Market Estimated to Reach $9.34 Billion by 2027
4 April 2022, Digital Journal

Open-source DBMS becoming battleground of public cloud
17 May 2022, Etnews

provided by Google News

Share this page