DBMS > Heroic vs. SAP Advantage Database Server vs. searchxml vs. Trafodion vs. Yanza

System Properties Comparison Heroic vs. SAP Advantage Database Server vs. searchxml vs. Trafodion vs. Yanza

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

SAP Advantage Database Server seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.

Apache Trafodion has been retired in 2021. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.

Yanza seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines Ranking.

Description

Time Series DBMS built at Spotify based on Cassandra or Google Cloud Bigtable, and ElasticSearch

Low-cost RDBMS with access to ISAM and FoxPro data structures

DBMS for structured and unstructured content wrapped with an application server

Transactional SQL-on-Hadoop DBMS

Time Series DBMS for IoT Applications

Primary database model

Time Series DBMS

Relational DBMS

Native XML DBMS
Search engine

Relational DBMS

Time Series DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.02
Rank	#363	Overall
	#37	Time Series DBMS

Score	0.00
Rank	#381	Overall
	#7	Native XML DBMS
	#24	Search engines

Website

github.com/spotify/heroic

www.sap.com/products/advantage-database-server.html

www.searchxml.net/category/products

trafodion.apache.org

yanza.com

Technical documentation

spotify.github.io/heroic

www.searchxml.net/support/handouts

trafodion.apache.org/documentation.html

Developer

Spotify

Sybase, SAP

informationpartners gmbh

Apache Software Foundation, originally developed by HP

Yanza

Initial release

2014

1993

2015

2014

2015

Current release

1.0

2.3.0, February 2019

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache 2.0

commercial

Open Source

Apache 2.0

commercial

free version available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

but mainly used as a service provided by Yanza

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C++

C++, Java

Server operating systems

Linux
Windows

Windows

Linux

Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

yes

schema-free

yes

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

via Elasticsearch

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

APIs and other access methods

HQL (Heroic Query Language, a JSON-based language)
HTTP API

.NET Client API
ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC
OLE DB

RESTful HTTP API
WebDAV
XQuery
XSLT

ADO.NET
JDBC
ODBC

HTTP API

Supported programming languages

Delphi
Perl
PHP

C++

most other programming languages supported via APIs

All languages supporting JDBC/ODBC/ADO.Net

any language that supports HTTP calls

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

on the application server

Java Stored Procedures

Triggers

yes

Timer and event based

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

none

Sharding

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Multi-source replication

CONFLICT Trigger to resolve replication conflicts
Source-replica replication

yes

sychronisation to multiple collections

yes, via HBase

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

via user defined functions and HBase

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency
Immediate Consistency

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

multiple readers, single writer

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

caching of (temporary) tables can be configured

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

Domain, group and role-based access control at the document level and for application services

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

How Code Wizards load tested Heroic Labs’ Nakama to two million concurrent players with AWS
1 October 2024, AWS Blog

Review: Google Bigtable scales with ease
7 September 2016, InfoWorld

provided by Google News

SAP Slams Oracle's Ad Tactics, Calls Rival's Campaign Imitative
26 July 2004, The Wall Street Journal

SAP Announces Q3 2023 Results: Asia Pacific and Japan View
19 October 2023, SAP News

provided by Google News

The Apache® Software Foundation Announces Annual Report for 2018 Fiscal Year
7 September 2018, GlobeNewswire

Low-latency, distributed database architectures are critical for emerging fog applications
7 April 2022, Embedded Computing Design

Fig. 4. Pictorial Representation of NoSQL III. NEWSQL DATABASE New SQL...
24 May 2019, ResearchGate

provided by Google News

Share this page