DBMS > Heroic vs. Memgraph
System Properties Comparison Heroic vs. Memgraph
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Heroic Xexclude from comparison||Memgraph Xexclude from comparison|
|Description||Time Series DBMS built at Spotify based on Cassandra or Google Cloud Bigtable, and ElasticSearch||A hybrid, in-memory first, distributed graph DBMS delivering high-performance on analytical and transactional workloads at enterprise scale|
|Primary database model||Time Series DBMS||Graph DBMS|
|License Commercial or Open Source||Open Source Apache 2.0||commercial Free license available|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Implementation language||Java||C and C++|
|Server operating systems||Linux|
|Data scheme||schema-free||schema-free and schema-optional|
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||yes||yes|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no||no|
|Secondary indexes||yes via Elasticsearch|
|SQL Support of SQL||no||no|
|APIs and other access methods||HQL (Heroic Query Language, a JSON-based language)|
Cypher query language
|Supported programming languages||.Net|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||no|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||Sharding||Sharding dynamic graph partitioning|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||yes||Multi-Master replication using RAFT|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no||no|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Eventual Consistency|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||no||yes relationships in graphs|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||no||ACID with snapshot isolation|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes, multi-version concurrency control (MVCC)|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes with periodic snapshot and write-ahead logging (WAL) of changes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||no||yes|
|User concepts Access control||Users, roles and permissions|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|Recent citations in the news|
'Spider-Man: Far From Home' Billboards Tease That *Gasp* Mysterio Might Not Be As Heroic As He Seems!
Kenny Dalglish: The Beacon of Light in Liverpool's Darkest Hour
Books to fill that 'Game of Thrones' jones
In need of rotation help, is a Yankees trade for Madison Bumgarner inevitable?
The Snyder Cut: What was Zack Snyder's original vision for ‘Justice League’?
provided by Google News
FactGem and Memgraph Partner to Give Clients Access to Real-Time, Transaction Based Analytics
Graph Database Market 2019: Top Companies, Market Trends and Growth Factors,Challenges With Forecast to 2024
Graph Database Market – Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast 2019-2025
Latest Research Report on Graph Database Market is projected to be around USD +445 million in 2026 | IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, AWS, Neo4j, Orientdb, Teradata, Tibco Software, Franz, Openlink Software
provided by Google News
Share this page