DBMS > Hazelcast vs. JSqlDb

System Properties Comparison Hazelcast vs. JSqlDb

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare Hazelcast and JSqlDb with Milvus, Databricks and MongoDB.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

JSqlDB seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

A widely adopted in-memory data grid

JavaScript Query Language Database, stores JavaScript objects and primitives

Primary database model

Key-value store

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

Secondary database models

Document store

JSON support with IMDG 3.12

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	7.92
Rank	#57	Overall
	#6	Key-value stores

Website

hazelcast.com

jsqldb.org (offline)

Technical documentation

hazelcast.org/imdg/docs

Developer

Hazelcast

Konrad von Backstrom

Initial release

2008

2018

Current release

5.3.2, August 2023

0.8, December 2018

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache Version 2; commercial licenses available

Open Source

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

Server operating systems

All OS with a Java VM

Linux
macOS
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

the object must implement a serialization strategy

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like query language

APIs and other access methods

JCache
JPA
Memcached protocol
RESTful HTTP API

Supported programming languages

.Net
C#
C++
Clojure
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Python
Scala

JavaScript

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Event Listeners, Executor Services

functions in JavaScript

Triggers

yes

Events

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

Replicated Map

none

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency or Eventual Consistency selectable by user

Raft Consensus Algorithm

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

one or two-phase-commit; repeatable reads; read commited

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

using RocksDB

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Role-based access control

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Hazelcast: The 'true' value of streaming real-time data
27 September 2023, ComputerWeekly.com

Real-Time Data Platform Hazelcast Introduces New Chief Technology Officer Adrian Soars
7 November 2023, Finovate

AArete partners with data firm Hazelcast
17 July 2023, Consulting.us

Anypoint Clustering with MuleSoft | by Jitendra Bafna | Another Integration Blog
31 March 2023, Medium

The Pinnacle of Real-Time Data Analysis: Stream Processing
2 October 2023, The New Stack

provided by Google News

Share this page