DBMS > Hawkular Metrics vs. LMDB vs. Manticore Search vs. OrigoDB

System Properties Comparison Hawkular Metrics vs. LMDB vs. Manticore Search vs. OrigoDB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Hawkular metrics is the metric storage of the Red Hat sponsored Hawkular monitoring system. It is based on Cassandra.

A high performant, light-weight, embedded key-value database library

Multi-storage database for search, including full-text search.

A fully ACID in-memory object graph database

Primary database model

Time Series DBMS

Key-value store

Search engine

Document store
Object oriented DBMS

Secondary database models

Time Series DBMS

using the Manticore Columnar Library

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.01
Rank	#377	Overall
	#39	Time Series DBMS

Score	1.94
Rank	#120	Overall
	#20	Key-value stores

Score	0.23
Rank	#301	Overall
	#21	Search engines

Score	0.00
Rank	#385	Overall
	#54	Document stores
	#21	Object oriented DBMS

Website

www.hawkular.org

www.symas.com/symas-embedded-database-lmdb

manticoresearch.com

origodb.com

Technical documentation

www.hawkular.org/hawkular-metrics/docs/user-guide

www.lmdb.tech/doc

manual.manticoresearch.com

origodb.com/docs

Developer

Community supported by Red Hat

Symas

Manticore Software

Robert Friberg et al

Initial release

2014

2011

2017

2009

under the name LiveDB

Current release

0.9.32, January 2024

6.0, February 2023

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

Apache 2.0

Open Source

GPL version 2

Open Source

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

Java

C++

Server operating systems

Linux
OS X
Windows

Linux
Unix
Windows

FreeBSD
Linux
macOS
Windows

Linux
Windows

Data scheme

schema-free

Fixed schema

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

Int, Bigint, Float, Timestamp, Bit, Int array, Bigint array, JSON, Boolean

User defined using .NET types and collections

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Can index from XML

can be achieved using .NET

Secondary indexes

yes

full-text index on all search fields

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

SQL-like query language

APIs and other access methods

HTTP REST

Binary API
RESTful HTTP/JSON API
RESTful HTTP/SQL API
SQL over MySQL

.NET Client API
HTTP API
LINQ

Supported programming languages

Go
Java
Python
Ruby

.Net
C
C++
Clojure
Go
Haskell
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Lisp
Lua
MatLab
Nim
Objective C
OCaml
Perl
PHP
Python
R
Ruby
Rust
Swift
Tcl

Elixir
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Perl
PHP
Python

.Net

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

yes

Triggers

yes

via Hawkular Alerting

yes

Domain Events

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

based on Cassandra

none

Sharding

Partitioning is done manually, search queries against distributed index is supported

horizontal partitioning

client side managed; servers are not synchronized

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

selectable replication factor

based on Cassandra

none

Synchronous replication based on Galera library

Source-replica replication

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency

based on Cassandra
Immediate Consistency

based on Cassandra

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

depending on model

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

yes

isolated transactions for atomic changes and binary logging for safe writes

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

The original contents of fields are not stored in the Manticore index.

yes

Write ahead log

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Role based authorization

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Waiting for Red Hat OpenShift 4.0? Too late, 4.1 has already arrived…
5 June 2019, DevClass

provided by Google News

Threat Actors Exploit Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ivanti Connect Secure and Policy Secure Gateways
29 February 2024, CISA

The Lightning Memory-mapped Database
2 March 2016, InfoQ.com

Akamai launches managed database service
25 April 2022, Blocks & Files

HarperDB - How and Why We Built It From The Ground Up on NodeJS
28 February 2021, hackernoon.com

The Tom Brady Data Biography
8 September 2023, StatsBomb

provided by Google News

Comparing Meilisearch and Manticore Search Using Key Benchmarks
2 May 2023, hackernoon.com

Manticore is a Faster Alternative to Elasticsearch in C++
25 July 2022, hackernoon.com

Integrating Manticore Search with Apache Superset
8 August 2023, hackernoon.com

Highlighting in Search Results
24 May 2020, hackernoon.com

40 Stories To Learn About Elasticsearch
27 April 2023, hackernoon.com

provided by Google News

Share this page