DBMS > Hawkular Metrics vs. Hypertable
System Properties Comparison Hawkular Metrics vs. Hypertable
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||Hawkular Metrics Xexclude from comparison||Hypertable Xexclude from comparison|
|Hypertable has stopped its further development with March 2016 and is removed from the DB-Engines ranking.|
|Description||Hawkular metrics is the metric storage of the Red Hat sponsored Hawkular monitoring system. It is based on Cassandra.||An open source BigTable implementation based on distributed file systems such as Hadoop|
|Primary database model||Time Series DBMS||Wide column store|
|Developer||Community supported by Red Hat||Hypertable Inc.|
|Current release||0.9.8.11, March 2016|
|License Commercial or Open Source||Open Source Apache 2.0||Open Source GNU version 3. Commercial license available|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Server operating systems||Linux|
Windows an inofficial Windows port is available
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||yes||no|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no|
|Secondary indexes||no||restricted only exact value or prefix value scans|
|SQL Support of SQL||no||no|
|APIs and other access methods||HTTP REST||C++ API|
|Supported programming languages||Go|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||no||no|
|Triggers||yes via Hawkular Alerting||no|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||Sharding based on Cassandra||Sharding|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||selectable replication factor based on Cassandra||selectable replication factor on file system level|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no||yes|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||Eventual Consistency based on Cassandra|
Immediate Consistency based on Cassandra
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||no||no|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||no||no|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||yes|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||no|
|User concepts Access control||no||no|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|Recent citations in the news|
Waiting for Red Hat OpenShift 4.0? Too late, 4.1 has already arrived ...
5 DevOps Tools for Logging and Monitoring
Interview with Tim Fox About Vert.x 3, the Original Reactive ...
provided by Google News
NoSQL Market Development Size 2023 |PostgreSQL, Oracle ...
TimescaleDB goes distributed; implements ‘Chunking’ over ‘Sharding’ for scaling-out
Why We Built Cloud Native Object Storage for PostgreSQL with ...
NoSQL Market: A well-defined technological growth map with an ...
Timescale Announces TimescaleDB 1.0—Empowering ...
provided by Google News
Sr. DevOps Engineer
Share this page